In Reply to: Put a Tranny in a ZH-270 posted by ABhagan on December 3, 2004 at 14:59:09:
I realize the annoyance I can become on this subject. I agree the amp adds nothing to the signal. A transfrmer in the signal path is not neccesarily a bad thing. A state of the art, transformer made by a craftsman is a beautiful thing. In the case of the volume potentiometer, if the signal goes through it I would think one with all copper windings would always sound better than one with carbon resistive material. Balancing inductive distortion and the distorion of the wiper pot attenuator is easy by just turning the zh all the way up and using a autoformer type passive device. It's sweet. I base this only on experience with these devices not experience building them. Just a thought.TC
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Put a Tranny in a ZH-270 - tcain 16:27:16 12/03/04 (8)
- Re: Put a Tranny in a ZH-270 - ABhagan 20:23:42 12/03/04 (7)
- Re: Put a Tranny in a ZH-270 - tcain 12:51:54 12/06/04 (1)
- Re: Put a Tranny in a ZH-270 - ABhagan 17:17:53 12/06/04 (0)
- Neutrality vs. Real - BadgerDMS 21:47:54 12/03/04 (4)
- Re: Neutrality vs. Real - ABhagan 05:36:14 12/04/04 (3)
- Re: Neutrality vs. Real - BadgerDMS 19:01:14 12/05/04 (2)
- Re: Neutrality vs. Real - ABhagan 19:46:01 12/05/04 (1)
- Re: Neutrality vs. Real - skip clemmons 13:19:42 01/09/05 (0)