In Reply to: Altec 17173 Choke Specifications posted by Triode_Kingdom on November 18, 2021 at 15:41:01:
I have two notes in my files, from conversations with Mike:"Original Peerless was two identical bays, nominally 5K/20K".
"17173 is nominally 5K/20Kct; the original was two bays, not reverse wound."
(A paragraph of my speculation was here, but TriodeKingdom's measurements indicated I was wrong - it's NOT airgapped.) edit 2021-12-19
(The EXO-173 was wound differently and interleaved for balanced push-pull operation.)
Edits: 12/15/21 12/19/21
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Altec 17173 Choke Specifications - Paul Joppa 16:24:21 12/15/21 (1)
- Thanks! PM sent. (nt) - Triode_Kingdom 10:32:02 12/16/21 (0)