|
MagneQuest/Peerless Forum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
|
|
MagneQuest/Peerless Forum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
In Reply to: how about a gyrator as an active load? posted by dhsettim on February 14, 2011 at 21:17:52:
Hi Tim,
Interesting idea, but I'm still trying to wrap my head around it. That's quite a long thread over on DIY Audio. In Gianluca's example, a 45 parafeed SET with a CCS active load would require a B+ of more than 700V and the CCS would need to dissipate 17W. Not so practical a solution. In short, what's the benefit of a gyrator over a CCS? Lower B+ requirement, less power dissipation..?
Thanks,
Dan
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: how about a gyrator as an active load? - DanK tubes 22:38:46 02/14/11 (1)
- RE: how about a gyrator as an active load? - dhsettim 21:14:12 02/15/11 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
