Isolation Ward

Poor baby

74.87.55.18

This Post Has Been Edited by the Author

In Reply to: RE: So what? posted by geoffkait on February 16, 2013 at 03:44:33

Sheldrake refukes the experiment you claim is proof of his theory. Note I never said his theory was incorrect, but there is sufficient writings to show that David Bohm the noted physicist never fully endorsed Sheldrake, no matter how much you want to claim that it is so.

As such, despite your addled reasoning:

1. There is NO proof of Morphic resonance, and as a matter of fact Shldrake himslef says any such proof may not be possible.

2. To quote Bohm's name as actively supporting morphic resonance, does NOT match the infprmation contained in Bohm's body of work.

3. Some of the examples in Sheldrake's book run contrary to , say, the work of Francis Crick. Cerainly the molecular formation of the crystals mentioned is actually in support of current thoughts of quantum theory, and has no relation to morphic resonance, since the electron quanta is what really determines the molecular formation, and which is also very predictable. If you are saying that quantum theory is a manifestation of morphic resonance, then so be it, but then with the quantum theory many things are explainabe, aren't they?

4. You desire validation so much you take an experiment put forth by Sheldrake and when later refuted by the man, you still claim that it is "proof" of his theory? Please reread your backfire effect article on wikipedia, as that seems to be your primary source of information. If that is not the backfire effect in operation, I don't know what would serve as a better example

Follow Ups: