In it's recent edition Positive Feedback Online continues to be a mouth piece for the controversial products and ideas of Peter Belt. Of course the skeptic in me is hardly surprised since started way back with Carol Clark's positive finding with the Photo in Fridge Tweak their path was inexorably set in the direction of more of the same since frankly the only reasonable alternative after something like that would be a quick (and permanent) disappearing act.Anyway the most recent contribution is an article by May Belt, the content a mixture of indignant can't get no respect and blame it on intolerance which would hardly come as a surprise to anyone who has sampled May Belt's contributions to online audio forums, this one included. Nonetheless the focus of the current article centers on the issue of the explanation for Beltian effects, i.e:
"But the real challenge in our work is presented by stumbling on repeatable and reversible effects from our products and then having to explain why and how they happen."
Now you may wondering... Why?, OH why?, is this fellow providing yet another post ridiculing those wacky Belts? Well perish the thought because I believe I may have stumbled across the explanation that has long eluded many, the Belts included.
Indeed it was May's request for assistance, "We are as interested as anyone else in finding a comprehensive theory to explain our discoveries...", which must have touched a tender spot in me, that prompted my Eureka! moment.
You see prior to that I must admit that I was still inwardly laughing at the following example of a Beltian tweak, a Dave Clark testimonial, that May had included:
"“First time I experienced Belt treatments. Had no clue what Carol was up to as I was in the other room, though I did know she was playing around with something audio. She asked me to come in and give a listen, but with the following constraints: 1) I had to play the same track three times in a row, and 2) I could not open my eyes during the session. Easy as pie! Out came my favorite Lambchop disc What Another Man Spoils and on went track 1. Hit play and… "Sounds fine Carol, sounds like it usually does; great recording, fun music, love it!" She hits Stop and after a few seconds, she hits Play again, and like "WOW, this sounds much better! Way more musical and golly-gosh-gee, this is really cool!" She hits Stop and a minute later, she hits Play again, and shit! I mean SHIT, this sounds like shit! Not the shit, but shit. Not more than 5 seconds into the track and STOP IT NOW BEFORE I TEAR MY EARS OFF! What did you do? "Well, the first time nothing, the second time I wrote Reimer > O.K! with this red pen on a piece of tape and placed one on the top of each speaker, and the third time I replaced the tape with another that said… Reimer > BAD." Huh, sounded as it usually did with nothing on the speaker, sounded really great when you wrote O.K, and sound really bad when you wrote Bad. Weird."
Golly-gosh-gee indeedy! ROTFL
Yes, I admit, that was my reaction until being touched by May's request. How to explain Dave Clark's reaction? Bang! It hit me! The tweak clearly is a Psychic Energy Focusing Lens and Carol Clark is most certainly a Psychic!
Think about it. There's no way a piece of tape with "Reimer > BAD." or "Reimer > O.K!" could in and of itself effect perception of the music being played, the very notion is clearly preposterous! But the tape acting as a Psychic Energy Focusing Lens allowing Carol Clark to beam intense karma at Dave Clark explains all. The negative case in particular is illuminating, "STOP IT NOW BEFORE I TEAR MY EARS OFF", clearly indicating the well known association between intense displeasure and bad karma.
So there you have it, at long last, mystery solved! And this is no just purely academic discovery, hardly!. Take for example the very important message that Dave Clark can divine, i.e. Brother you'd had better never really Piss Off your better half because if you do and she were to get her hands on a Voodoo Doll you ability to enjoy music would be completely irrelevant in comparison to the major hurt that she have visit upon your sorry arse.
No Guru, No Method, No Teacher
Edits: 30/21/01 30/21/01 30/21/01 30/21/01 30/21/01 30/21/01
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - May Belt Article in current Positive Feedback Online - bjh 08:52:06 04/18/07 (71)
- Opps... the link - bjh 08:54:10 04/18/07 (0)
- Beltian effects - Sommovigo 10:08:12 04/18/07 (59)
- Or make changes in the software, in the recording. nt - TomLarson 12:25:39 04/18/07 (4)
- But that would be the same change ... - Sommovigo 13:38:25 04/18/07 (3)
- Re: But that would be the same change ... - TomLarson 10:38:41 04/19/07 (2)
- fixed variable - Sommovigo 10:54:50 04/19/07 (1)
- Yup, Liked it a lot! nt... - TomLarson 11:36:05 04/19/07 (0)
- I'll drink to that! (NT) - Kal Rubinson 15:41:27 04/18/07 (2)
- Would be a belt of - Sommovigo 16:10:39 04/18/07 (1)
- Wry. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 17:33:38 04/18/07 (0)
- Two things... - bjh 17:21:00 04/18/07 (30)
- Re: Two things... - Sommovigo 17:34:10 04/18/07 (29)
- Re: Two things... - bjh 20:51:11 04/18/07 (28)
- Don't forget they are vendors, not audio consumers like us. - cheap-Jack 08:20:07 05/15/07 (0)
- Belief - Sommovigo 21:40:29 04/18/07 (6)
- Captain and Tennille - JCS 02:46:35 04/19/07 (2)
- Capt and Tenille - Sommovigo 08:44:40 04/19/07 (1)
- Captain and Tennille - JCS 09:35:04 04/19/07 (0)
- I think most of us listeners are already tweaked - Kloss 06:13:10 04/19/07 (0)
- Those two don't hold a candle to the Starland Vocal Band... - Wellfed 21:21:25 04/23/07 (1)
- Starland's Afternoon Delight ... - Sommovigo 07:23:26 04/24/07 (0)
- I cant leave it at that - Analog Scott 08:11:24 04/19/07 (19)
- Rule of the game: Vendors know what they sell, but ... - cheap-Jack 12:26:10 05/14/07 (0)
- Why do placebos work "X" percent of the time? - Bruce Kendall 11:21:40 04/19/07 (17)
- Re: Why do placebos work "X" percent of the time? - TomLarson 11:40:44 04/19/07 (0)
- Re: Why do placebos work "X" percent of the time? - Analog Scott 12:12:49 04/19/07 (6)
- By giving it a label (snake oil) - Bruce Kendall 13:39:56 04/19/07 (5)
- Re: By giving it a label (snake oil) - Analog Scott 13:58:07 04/19/07 (2)
- You got it. - Bruce Kendall 14:09:59 04/19/07 (0)
- Who says snake oil doesn't work? - Dave Pogue 05:42:58 04/20/07 (0)
- Re: By giving it a label (snake oil) - morricab 16:34:26 04/22/07 (1)
- But the thing is... - Wellfed 10:56:49 04/23/07 (0)
- "I have much better ways to spend my money." And you know this... how...? nt - clarkjohnsen 13:27:55 04/21/07 (8)
- Did I mention that I have friends who are - Bruce Kendall 13:36:40 04/21/07 (6)
- Are we to asume then that you've listened? You seem to be avoiding such a statement... nt - clarkjohnsen 13:38:56 04/21/07 (5)
- I have. Several tests, and in my listening room. -t - Bruce Kendall 16:19:15 04/21/07 (0)
- That's really funny coming from you. Do you recommend Belt's pic-in-freezer "tweak"? nt - Rick W 09:02:29 04/22/07 (0)
- Re: Are we to asume then that you've listened? You seem to be avoiding such a statement... nt - morricab 16:29:25 04/22/07 (2)
- Add to "deadly dull prose", "stodgy humor". nt - clarkjohnsen 07:49:13 04/23/07 (1)
- Re: Add to "deadly dull prose", "stodgy humor". nt - morricab 09:34:45 04/23/07 (0)
- Re: "I have much better ways to spend my money." And you know this... how...? nt - morricab 16:31:18 04/22/07 (0)
- Re: Beltian effects - Analog Scott 07:54:24 04/19/07 (1)
- Very interesting point! - Sommovigo 08:41:18 04/19/07 (0)
- Do you really believe..... - Rick W 12:09:47 04/19/07 (15)
- Belief - Sommovigo 12:16:25 04/19/07 (14)
- Well, Mr. Clark didn't know what was being done, so he lacked the "benefit" of a pre-existing belief. - Enophile 12:33:27 04/19/07 (6)
- Mysterious ... - Sommovigo 13:27:57 04/19/07 (1)
- My hunch... - Enophile 14:21:46 04/19/07 (0)
- Re: Well, Mr. Clark didn't know what was being done, so he lacked the "benefit" of a pre-existing belief. - apesma 14:09:22 04/19/07 (3)
- Ummmm...? How to say it? Ah! got it. - bjh 14:30:26 04/19/07 (1)
- Re: Ummmm...? How to say it? Ah! got it. - apesma 14:33:13 04/19/07 (0)
- If you change just one belief this year... - Wellfed 15:09:57 04/22/07 (0)
- How do you suppose Belt arrived at the pic in freezer thing? - Rick W 13:26:33 04/19/07 (6)
- Re: How do you suppose Belt arrived at the pic in freezer thing? - Sommovigo 13:29:37 04/19/07 (3)
- Thanx. A chuckle is always welcome. nt - Rick W 13:51:20 04/19/07 (0)
- Yeah, but... - Wellfed 17:19:58 04/23/07 (1)
- Bad Acid and Acid Bad ... - Sommovigo 17:55:44 04/23/07 (0)
- "Putting purple lipstick on your dog?" - SF tech 08:52:25 04/20/07 (1)
- Works better if you send me money for a "specially treated" lipstick. - Enophile 08:55:30 04/20/07 (0)
- Re: "Beltian effects" otherwise known as pyschoactive drugs - Bruce from DC 15:57:31 04/20/07 (0)
- Score: Sommovigo-10, Other side-...er,... - cdb 20:07:27 04/20/07 (0)
- A perfect opportunity for real insight. Any chance Dave Clark could help? - Enophile 11:48:16 04/19/07 (1)
- Re: A perfect opportunity for real insight. Any chance Dave Clark could help? - bjh 12:43:32 04/19/07 (0)
- Ping The Bored - bjh 13:27:48 04/20/07 (7)
- Re: Troll cops plea. LOL nt - geoffkait 16:34:21 04/20/07 (3)
- I take an insult from you, ... - bjh 10:05:19 04/21/07 (2)
- Re: I see your point; I should have said: - geoffkait 11:08:00 04/21/07 (1)
- Opps, forgot to add, - bjh 11:10:24 04/21/07 (0)
- Actually . . - Frank E 17:45:10 04/20/07 (0)
- Yep. - Dave Pogue 16:35:04 04/22/07 (1)
- Re: Yep. - bjh 08:23:20 04/23/07 (0)