In Reply to: It's all in your mind posted by geoffkait on August 17, 2011 at 18:05:02:
for being a Theoretical Physicist". I actually am acquainted with one, a cosmologist to be more precise and he never calls himself a theoretical physicist, just a plain physicist dealing more with theory. Interestingly he has published papers on his thoughts and theories. Papers which have met peer review and use third party observational points to support his theorie.
All I get from you is anecdotal quips, and no third party verification of even the basic claims. I notice how conveniently you avoid my proposal of verifying that the effect even exists....
Seems to me that the effect is basically all in your mind since you refuse even conducting the most basic of tests to verify what you claim.
Stu
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Please suibmit your credentials - unclestu 12:55:05 08/26/11 (8)
- Ah, I get it, you actually think this is some sort of peer review... - geoffkait 15:38:45 08/26/11 (7)
- Name calling in lieu - unclestu 16:20:33 09/02/11 (6)
- More huffing and puffing - geoffkait 08:58:57 09/04/11 (5)
- In regards to being your peer - unclestu 14:51:31 09/20/11 (2)
- You're close, very cose - geoffkait 07:08:46 09/21/11 (1)
- So you wet your bed? - unclestu 14:39:16 09/26/11 (0)
- You are a perfect - unclestu 16:04:07 09/07/11 (1)
- You never tire - geoffkait 19:21:07 09/07/11 (0)