In Reply to: RE: So.... posted by May Belt on July 22, 2010 at 04:42:25:
Stu said:
[quote] "I do believe that there is fundamentally sound science behind many so called "voodoo" tweaks. A better understanding provides not only better implementation but but also superior application." [/quote]
If I can be so bold, what Uncle Stu really meant by his statement above about "fundamentally sound science" is that conventional, already understood physics can explain voodoo tweaks. He's actually dismissing any "alternatuve explanations" for clocks, foils, chips, pens. Recall Stu concluded that the clever clock with magnets attached "channels RFI."
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Sound science - geoffkait 04:57:55 07/22/10 (9)
- RE: Sound science - rick_m 07:41:33 07/22/10 (8)
- RE: Sound science - geoffkait 08:03:37 07/22/10 (7)
- RE: Sound science - rick_m 10:12:44 07/22/10 (6)
- RE: "Arm waving" Huh? - geoffkait 10:34:54 07/22/10 (5)
- Huh? - unclestu 16:15:28 07/22/10 (4)
- RE: "Anyone put more into explaining the tweaks? Don't make me laugh." - geoffkait 17:18:36 07/22/10 (3)
- Yeah - unclestu 15:50:05 07/23/10 (2)
- RE: "I've read your stuff but it doesn't hold sense in the world I live in." - geoffkait 04:02:52 07/24/10 (1)
- OK "scientist" - unclestu 18:35:18 07/26/10 (0)