In Reply to: RE: This is funnier posted by geoffkait on July 17, 2010 at 05:20:03:
What did you do in order to treat the foil? Seems that you have all the answers, but then again failure to replicate is hardly an answer, is it?
Stating "been there and done that", means absolutely nothing unless you provide details. I can unequivocally state that in controlled testing, my foil and the sample obtained from Belt, displayed identical properties every where I tried it. And while I can not vouch for your testing and methodology, I believe I go to far further testing than most people do.
You claim to be a scientist, of sorts, let us see your experimentation pattern. I seriously doubt if the Belts actually make their own foil
Stu
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- So.... - unclestu 18:20:54 07/21/10 (39)
- RE: So.... - May Belt 04:42:25 07/22/10 (10)
- RE: Sound science - geoffkait 04:57:55 07/22/10 (9)
- RE: Sound science - rick_m 07:41:33 07/22/10 (8)
- RE: Sound science - geoffkait 08:03:37 07/22/10 (7)
- RE: Sound science - rick_m 10:12:44 07/22/10 (6)
- RE: "Arm waving" Huh? - geoffkait 10:34:54 07/22/10 (5)
- Huh? - unclestu 16:15:28 07/22/10 (4)
- RE: "Anyone put more into explaining the tweaks? Don't make me laugh." - geoffkait 17:18:36 07/22/10 (3)
- Yeah - unclestu 15:50:05 07/23/10 (2)
- RE: "I've read your stuff but it doesn't hold sense in the world I live in." - geoffkait 04:02:52 07/24/10 (1)
- OK "scientist" - unclestu 18:35:18 07/26/10 (0)
- RE: "I seriously doubt if the Belts actually make their own foil." - geoffkait 04:00:21 07/22/10 (27)
- You are avoiding the issue - unclestu 16:13:22 07/22/10 (26)
- RE: You are avoiding the issue - May Belt 04:43:55 07/23/10 (24)
- My point exactly - unclestu 18:37:27 07/26/10 (23)
- RE: My point exactly - May Belt 10:46:05 07/28/10 (22)
- RE: My point exactly - unclestu 22:00:41 07/28/10 (21)
- RE: My point exactly - May Belt 11:48:19 07/29/10 (20)
- Interesting - unclestu 17:07:33 08/02/10 (19)
- RE: Interesting - May Belt 04:25:22 08/05/10 (0)
- RE: "Why 320 Hz?" - geoffkait 10:05:46 08/04/10 (17)
- Funny - unclestu 00:05:43 08/05/10 (3)
- RE: Not so Funny - geoffkait 03:36:45 08/05/10 (2)
- Your leap to - unclestu 17:46:36 08/11/10 (1)
- RE: Mysticism - geoffkait 03:07:56 08/12/10 (0)
- RE: "Why 320 Hz?" - rick_m 11:03:54 08/04/10 (12)
- RE: "What books?" - geoffkait 11:16:29 08/04/10 (11)
- RE: "What books?" - rick_m 21:55:36 08/04/10 (3)
- Pop Quiz - geoffkait 08:14:32 08/06/10 (2)
- Yawn... back to morphic resonance, - unclestu 17:49:19 08/04/10 (6)
- RE: Molecular biologists - geoffkait 04:37:10 08/05/10 (0)
- RE: Yawn... back to morphic resonance, - May Belt 04:21:40 08/05/10 (4)
- The beauty of science - unclestu 15:40:59 08/06/10 (3)
- RE: The beauty of science - May Belt 04:06:12 08/07/10 (2)
- RE: "Unless Peter and May have super natural powers, I would simply conclude their process can be replicated." - geoffkait 17:07:32 07/22/10 (0)