In Reply to: RE: "I'm also in favor of tweaking actual gear!" posted by geoffkait on June 22, 2010 at 10:11:27:
I suspect the Belt Rainbow foil acts like a constrained layer dampening device which helps dissipate the RF energy. The construction is a sandwich of plastic and aluminum foil. The foil itself is laser etched to extremely fine etchings, typically at the wavelengths of like ( in order that it have the proper effects on light), thus we have, in effect tiny antennas, and when trimmed to the small widths recommended it effectively can become RFI absorbers.
As for the crystals, simple experimentation has revealed that piezoelectric crystals seems to impart a greater sonic difference. The Shakti Stones are based on a similar application according to their patents, except their housings serve as microwave tunnels guides of sorts focusing the energy upon the crystals they use.
There are many circuit mods and such which have yet to be popularized, however. Power supply isolation and the implementation of isolated supplies, I find very critical for better sound. Very few modern designers really implement such designs, however. One interesting piece I had a chance to examine was a older Grommes design (IIRC). The amp had two rectifiers, a 5U4 for the power tubes and a 6X4 for the input tubes. Sounded good and it was quite interesting, but something no ,modern designer has really used (Although the CJ Premier 350 has separate rectifiers for the front end as well as the output devices).
I do believe that there is fundamentally sound science behind many so called "voodoo" tweaks. A better understanding provides not only better implementation but but also superior application.
Stu
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- rainbow foil - unclestu 14:05:57 06/25/10 (65)
- RE: Piezoelectric crystals - geoffkait 05:37:06 06/26/10 (16)
- RE: Piezoelectric crystals - unclestu 18:08:52 07/12/10 (6)
- RE: Piezoelectric crystals - geoffkait 04:34:25 07/17/10 (5)
- RE: Piezoelectric crystals - rick_m 07:42:24 07/17/10 (4)
- RE: Piezoelectric crystals - geoffkait 08:14:32 07/17/10 (3)
- RE: Piezoelectric crystals - rick_m 09:35:00 07/17/10 (2)
- RE: Piezoelectric crystals - geoffkait 10:17:38 07/17/10 (1)
- RE: Piezoelectric crystals - rick_m 13:56:46 07/17/10 (0)
- RE: Piezoelectric crystals - rick_m 06:51:19 06/29/10 (8)
- Always nice to hear from someone - geoffkait 10:59:41 06/29/10 (7)
- Sonny.... - rick_m 12:27:45 06/29/10 (6)
- No worries, Rick M, Geoffie is just trolling you. - Enophile 08:27:34 06/30/10 (1)
- What, me worry? - rick_m 20:11:45 06/30/10 (0)
- You may call me Sunny - geoffkait 14:09:16 06/29/10 (3)
- Rick - unclestu 18:16:07 07/12/10 (2)
- RE: Cluster of tourmaline - geoffkait 05:30:07 07/13/10 (1)
- RE: Cluster of tourmaline - rick_m 07:02:53 07/13/10 (0)
- RE: rainbow foil - geoffkait 03:55:02 06/26/10 (44)
- RE: rainbow foil - unclestu 18:10:27 07/12/10 (43)
- RE: rainbow foil - geoffkait 10:32:50 07/13/10 (42)
- That's funny - unclestu 17:49:30 07/16/10 (41)
- RE: This is funnier - geoffkait 05:20:03 07/17/10 (40)
- So.... - unclestu 18:20:54 07/21/10 (39)
- RE: So.... - May Belt 04:42:25 07/22/10 (10)
- RE: Sound science - geoffkait 04:57:55 07/22/10 (9)
- RE: Sound science - rick_m 07:41:33 07/22/10 (8)
- RE: Sound science - geoffkait 08:03:37 07/22/10 (7)
- RE: Sound science - rick_m 10:12:44 07/22/10 (6)
- RE: "Arm waving" Huh? - geoffkait 10:34:54 07/22/10 (5)
- Huh? - unclestu 16:15:28 07/22/10 (4)
- RE: "Anyone put more into explaining the tweaks? Don't make me laugh." - geoffkait 17:18:36 07/22/10 (3)
- Yeah - unclestu 15:50:05 07/23/10 (2)
- RE: "I've read your stuff but it doesn't hold sense in the world I live in." - geoffkait 04:02:52 07/24/10 (1)
- OK "scientist" - unclestu 18:35:18 07/26/10 (0)
- RE: "I seriously doubt if the Belts actually make their own foil." - geoffkait 04:00:21 07/22/10 (27)
- You are avoiding the issue - unclestu 16:13:22 07/22/10 (26)
- RE: You are avoiding the issue - May Belt 04:43:55 07/23/10 (24)
- My point exactly - unclestu 18:37:27 07/26/10 (23)
- RE: My point exactly - May Belt 10:46:05 07/28/10 (22)
- RE: My point exactly - unclestu 22:00:41 07/28/10 (21)
- RE: My point exactly - May Belt 11:48:19 07/29/10 (20)
- Interesting - unclestu 17:07:33 08/02/10 (19)
- RE: Interesting - May Belt 04:25:22 08/05/10 (0)
- RE: "Why 320 Hz?" - geoffkait 10:05:46 08/04/10 (17)
- Funny - unclestu 00:05:43 08/05/10 (3)
- RE: Not so Funny - geoffkait 03:36:45 08/05/10 (2)
- Your leap to - unclestu 17:46:36 08/11/10 (1)
- RE: Mysticism - geoffkait 03:07:56 08/12/10 (0)
- RE: "Why 320 Hz?" - rick_m 11:03:54 08/04/10 (12)
- RE: "What books?" - geoffkait 11:16:29 08/04/10 (11)
- RE: "What books?" - rick_m 21:55:36 08/04/10 (3)
- Pop Quiz - geoffkait 08:14:32 08/06/10 (2)
- Yawn... back to morphic resonance, - unclestu 17:49:19 08/04/10 (6)
- RE: Molecular biologists - geoffkait 04:37:10 08/05/10 (0)
- RE: Yawn... back to morphic resonance, - May Belt 04:21:40 08/05/10 (4)
- The beauty of science - unclestu 15:40:59 08/06/10 (3)
- RE: The beauty of science - May Belt 04:06:12 08/07/10 (2)
- RE: "Unless Peter and May have super natural powers, I would simply conclude their process can be replicated." - geoffkait 17:07:32 07/22/10 (0)
- RE: rainbow foil - May Belt 22:05:48 06/25/10 (2)
- Uh, oh. Better read Geoff's reply. - Enophile 12:56:40 06/28/10 (1)
- RE: Uh, oh. Better read Geoff's reply. - May Belt 05:04:47 07/01/10 (0)