In Reply to: Eight hours later and all we see below is bluster: "It's a con" summarizes nicely. posted by clarkjohnsen on March 21, 2007 at 10:54:37:
I asked where that acceptable (technical) explanation is, two years after you were willing to place a bet that it would appear any time soon. Where is it, show us! I mean, one that holds water when being put to the test.Klaus
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I didn't ask for a list of "expert witnesses" ! - KlausR. 11:09:05 03/21/07 (5)
- It will never happen. ;-) - AbeCollins 11:35:53 03/21/07 (1)
- Build a better mousetrap... - Wellfed 12:22:30 03/21/07 (0)
- You didn't ask for an explanation either. Moreover, where did I say... - clarkjohnsen 11:40:40 03/21/07 (2)
- Little refresher! - KlausR. 01:14:21 03/22/07 (1)
- What is more... - KlausR. 01:23:32 03/22/07 (0)