Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Two years further and still no explanation for the Intelligent Chip - KlausR. 02:54:39 03/21/07 (73)

• Re: Two years further and still no explanation for the Intelligent Chip - 120nwb 17:59:43 04/05/07 (1)
• Re: What do protons have to do with it? - KlausR. 01:16:21 04/06/07 (0)
• Re: Two years further - geoffkait 16:53:46 03/21/07 (0)
• I've heard that prayer helps cd performance. Tried it? nt - tinear 04:42:16 03/21/07 (13)
• Take that crap Outside, Tin. nt - Jack Seaton 06:57:57 03/21/07 (12)
• Indeed... and this whole crap thread should be relocated to Prop Head (or to Isolation Ward). nt - bjh 07:18:47 03/21/07 (11)
• ABSOLUTELY agree on you about Isolation ward.nt:-) - jneutron 07:21:27 03/21/07 (10)
• Re: ABSOLUTELY agree on you about Isolation ward.nt:-) - bjh 07:55:21 03/21/07 (9)
• You may be correct. - jneutron 08:44:29 03/21/07 (8)
• Who you callin' vocal and uncivil??? - kerr 09:21:00 03/21/07 (7)
• gurbleflurb??? What a cool word... - jneutron 09:28:58 03/21/07 (6)
• Very Douglas Adams - I've written them down nt - clifff 09:51:05 03/21/07 (1)
• Closer to Lurch Addams, actually :) (nt) - kerr 10:33:58 03/21/07 (0)
• Gurbleflurb defined - kerr 10:33:13 03/21/07 (2)
• Well, I googled it, and got nuttin. - jneutron 12:00:38 03/21/07 (1)
• I made it up - kerr 13:40:09 03/21/07 (0)
• gurbleflurb??? What a cool word... - jlupine 13:50:49 03/21/07 (0)
• Why don't you concentrate on you own unsubstantiated claims? - bjh 04:51:14 03/21/07 (17)
• What unsubstantiated claim?? - jneutron 06:40:27 03/21/07 (16)
• "What unsubstantiated claim??" Go study the - bjh 07:16:21 03/21/07 (15)
• I read the links. How do ya think I knew about the monkeys? - jneutron 07:20:26 03/21/07 (14)
• Wanna play stupid, eh? OK... - bjh 07:50:41 03/21/07 (13)
• You provide the substantiation in your link, then ignore it?? - jneutron 08:41:52 03/21/07 (12)
• Listen up! - bjh 09:08:24 03/21/07 (11)
• You've made absolutely no sense. - jneutron 09:16:44 03/21/07 (4)
• II - bjh 09:22:06 03/21/07 (3)
• See what I mean? you have nothing technical to add, so resort to this. - jneutron 09:30:45 03/21/07 (2)
• II nt - bjh 09:45:12 03/21/07 (1)
• Excellent.. Now, you can actually put words in when you can discuss the topic.nt - jneutron 09:50:24 03/21/07 (0)
• Once in a while is not a habit! - KlausR. 10:31:05 03/21/07 (5)
• I'm not interested in speculation... - bjh 11:03:29 03/21/07 (2)
• bjh: ""I really don't know"".....bingo, that pretty much sums it. - jneutron 11:58:01 03/21/07 (1)
• Maybe you should do the work for KlausR., you do seem interested. Until then... II LOL nt - bjh 13:38:04 03/21/07 (0)
• You were right, it's not worth the effort.. - jneutron 11:40:15 03/21/07 (1)
• How come that I knew this when hitting the "send" button" ? (nt) - KlausR. 01:02:41 03/22/07 (0)
• Were you really expecting anything else? - Dan Banquer 05:25:54 03/21/07 (8)
• Re: Were you really expecting anything else? - KlausR. 06:28:45 03/21/07 (6)
• Re: Were you really expecting anything else? - Dan Banquer 06:44:43 03/21/07 (5)
• Hey, I'll toss in the salsa..nt - jneutron 06:54:15 03/21/07 (4)
• Who's bringing the beer? nt - Dan Banquer 07:02:48 03/21/07 (3)
• YOU are a cad. I hate you.. - jneutron 07:16:15 03/21/07 (2)
• Re: YOU are a cad. I hate you.. - Dan Banquer 07:20:46 03/21/07 (1)
• You too? - gbeard 07:59:36 03/21/07 (0)
• Why Of Course Not...... - Todd Krieger 10:36:11 03/21/07 (0)
• Why would anyone bother with you? nt - Norm 06:29:54 03/21/07 (0)
• On the contrary - Jim Austin 07:09:06 03/21/07 (10)
• Yes, it is. - Bruce from DC 08:06:55 03/21/07 (7)
• It's a con. - LarryB 11:52:56 03/21/07 (5)
• congratulations, Larry - Bruce from DC 13:39:52 03/21/07 (4)
• "Bam, Bam, Bam!!!" - Bruce comes out with both barrells blaring... - darkmoebius 18:46:38 04/23/07 (0)
• Re: Just another shmuck with - geoffkait 16:24:28 03/21/07 (1)
• You are tangling with a hot-shot D.C. lawyer; if he says it's a con, it has to be a con. That, or... - clarkjohnsen 11:23:10 03/22/07 (1)
• That sums it very nicely, Thank you Bruce. - Dan Banquer 15:44:51 03/21/07 (0)
• Rather, it is a Humbug. - Al Sekela 13:26:24 03/21/07 (0)
• Well, yes, psychology and neuroscience do explain the phenomenon, but... - KlausR. 09:02:13 03/21/07 (0)
• My two cents - LarryB 10:05:21 03/21/07 (0)
• I should bring that expl. to some of the world's leading researchers at lunch.. - jneutron 07:33:23 03/21/07 (4)
• Re: I should bring that expl. to some of the world's leading researchers at lunch.. - Dan Banquer 09:16:40 03/21/07 (3)
• hey old man.. - jneutron 09:26:16 03/21/07 (2)
• Re: hey old man.. - Dan Banquer 09:34:34 03/21/07 (1)
• Re: hey old man.. - jneutron 09:45:08 03/21/07 (0)
• Re: Two years further and still no explanation for the Intelligent Chip - andy19191 08:19:44 03/21/07 (0)
• Eight hours later and all we see below is bluster: "It's a con" summarizes nicely. - clarkjohnsen 10:54:37 03/21/07 (7)
• I didn't ask for a list of "expert witnesses" ! - KlausR. 11:09:05 03/21/07 (5)
• It will never happen. ;-) - AbeCollins 11:35:53 03/21/07 (1)
• Build a better mousetrap... - Wellfed 12:22:30 03/21/07 (0)
• You didn't ask for an explanation either. Moreover, where did I say... - clarkjohnsen 11:40:40 03/21/07 (2)
• Little refresher! - KlausR. 01:14:21 03/22/07 (1)
• What is more... - KlausR. 01:23:32 03/22/07 (0)
• Hmmmmm... credible perhaps, and perhaps a wee bit biased as well? nt - Presto 13:33:21 03/21/07 (0)
• 30+ years later and we still don't know if Elvis is alive or dead?! - danny kaey 14:03:02 03/21/07 (0)
• Re: my God, when will this EVER die? - LousyTourist 14:20:54 03/21/07 (1)
• That's just TOO damn simple! It will never work!... - musetap 22:33:18 03/21/07 (0)

Follow Ups

• Hmmmmm... credible perhaps, and perhaps a wee bit biased as well? nt - Presto 13:33:21 03/21/07 (0)