In Reply to: Look, we all recognize it when a blowhard can't supply the same sort of "proof" he demands from others. BUT... posted by clarkjohnsen on February 8, 2007 at 12:05:48:
Any audibility claim Clark agrees with = needs no proofProof of audibility is never needed for subjective auditions.
If any objective audibility tests are done, they are never good enough ... unless Clark likes the results = then their methodology is "perfect"!
You're bias is showing.
,
,
,
,
Richard BassNut Greene
Subjective Audiophile 2007
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Typical Clark "Catch 22" (Everything requires proof ... but no test is done right ... unless Clark likes the results) - Richard BassNut Greene 09:51:36 02/09/07 (0)