In Reply to: Hand Cream and static. posted by May Belt on July 23, 2007 at 12:43:07:
...that does *not* implicate a Belt effect? I mean, even just *touching* something, fer Heaven's sake!
Cannot a procedure have duple or even triple reasons for its effect?
And finally, when one destaticizes a CD or LP electromagnetically (or with a Bedini thingie), no cream, no touching, doesn't that surely suggest a non-Beltian attribute?
clark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- First, quick response -- more to come. May, is there *anything* one can do to one's system... - clarkjohnsen 14:15:24 07/23/07 (45)
- RE: First, quick response -- more to come. May, is there *anything* one can do to one's system... - May Belt 08:03:31 07/25/07 (19)
- RE: First, quick response -- more to come. May, is there *anything* one can do to one's system... - rick_m 10:16:39 07/25/07 (0)
- The examples you offer are geared towards a Beltist explanation. And... - clarkjohnsen 09:06:10 07/25/07 (17)
- RE: The examples you offer are geared towards a Beltist explanation. And... - Posy Rorer 14:46:58 07/25/07 (15)
- You write as though I'm denying the Beltist phenomena; I am not. I'm just trying to... - clarkjohnsen 08:28:45 07/26/07 (14)
- My argument is the lotion tweak is a Beltist tweak. And nothing else. - Posy Rorer 11:22:30 07/26/07 (13)
- How we gonna separate the variables? nt - clarkjohnsen 07:53:28 07/30/07 (6)
- Easy. Test passive devices in another room. nt - Posy Rorer 22:04:53 07/30/07 (5)
- Do we know that such a move obliterates the effect? Maybe go next door? nt - clarkjohnsen 08:41:19 07/31/07 (4)
- Yes, well going or placing the DUT next door will obliterate both conventional and Beltist effects. -nt - Posy Rorer 12:55:47 07/31/07 (3)
- What if "next door" is an apartment and thier rooms are contiguous with yours? (Just askin'...) - clarkjohnsen 09:40:29 08/01/07 (2)
- RE: What if "next door" is an apartment and thier rooms are contiguous with yours? (Just askin'...) - May Belt 12:37:29 08/01/07 (1)
- "Science does not begin to touch a fraction of how and why things work." No argument here! And... - clarkjohnsen 12:44:37 08/01/07 (0)
- Wow. That was quite a string of insults! A+ for effort! - Enophile 14:53:34 07/26/07 (5)
- Awww shucks, tweren't nuthin'.... No, really. - Posy Rorer 21:40:45 07/26/07 (4)
- Poser, showing his reflective, thoughtful side.... - rlw 07:43:21 07/30/07 (2)
- RLW's reflective side: "Make the giant, manly leap and show up on my doorstep while runnin' yer big mouth." - Posy Rorer 15:35:39 07/31/07 (0)
- SF Tech troll, have you met the Richard L. Wainwright troll? - Posy Rorer 22:00:58 07/30/07 (0)
- Posy, that is quite a manifesto you have there... - SF tech 23:32:47 07/26/07 (0)
- RE: The examples you offer are geared towards a Beltist explanation. And... - May Belt 10:34:38 07/25/07 (0)
- RE: First, quick response -- more to come. May, is there *anything* one can do to one's system... - May Belt 15:21:34 07/23/07 (24)
- "So, Clark, I ask you." And ye shall be answered. - clarkjohnsen 10:57:07 07/24/07 (9)
- RE: "So, Clark, I ask you." And ye shall be answered. - May Belt 14:52:56 07/24/07 (8)
- And more, and more - clarkjohnsen 09:13:26 07/25/07 (5)
- RE: And more, and more - May Belt 03:51:15 07/26/07 (1)
- Thanks for the essay, it elucidates the phenomenon wonderfully. - clarkjohnsen 08:18:56 07/30/07 (0)
- Perfect question. The whole jar being in the room or the house should have a proportionately large impact. - Enophile 10:36:07 07/25/07 (2)
- RE: Perfect question. The whole jar being in the room or the house should have a proportionately large impact. - Posy Rorer 15:12:19 07/25/07 (1)
- Thanks, your answer is logically consistent. We gotta drink and listen together. - Enophile 15:22:22 07/25/07 (0)
- RE: "So, Clark, I ask you." And ye shall be answered. - May Belt 08:01:57 07/25/07 (1)
- A static charge - unclestu52 19:14:29 07/25/07 (0)
- You presume, of course,... - rlw 10:53:25 07/24/07 (12)
- RE: You presume, of course,... - May Belt 14:49:06 07/24/07 (7)
- Only because Posy claimed that was my "problem"... - rlw 09:46:34 07/26/07 (6)
- RE: Only because Posy claimed that was my "problem"... - May Belt 02:01:32 07/27/07 (5)
- Sorry, May, the record speaks for itself... - rlw 05:39:40 07/27/07 (4)
- Yes it does. And the record shows that you're an insincere troll with a tweak-bashing agenda. - Posy Rorer 08:59:40 07/28/07 (2)
- Man, I'm LOVIN' this! - rlw 15:38:57 07/29/07 (1)
- Great job, "rlw". Thanks for confirming your troll status. You can be safely ignored now. -nt - Posy Rorer 22:11:28 07/30/07 (0)
- RE: Sorry, May, the record speaks for itself... - May Belt 08:42:03 07/27/07 (0)
- "I'll wait while you collect your thoughts..." Condescending, patronizing, fatuous... - clarkjohnsen 11:01:16 07/24/07 (3)
- Well, well, Mr. Johnsen... - rlw 11:12:27 07/24/07 (2)
- It's your "attitude*, dude, not your questions. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:30:45 07/24/07 (1)
- You might be on to something there, dear boy... - rlw 11:46:34 07/24/07 (0)
- "As a 'professional in audio' one cannot 'flounder around'" - pburant 08:43:35 07/24/07 (0)