63.16.75.240
In Reply to: RE: Lemaitre also demonstrated the math. Einstein didn't believe him. -nt posted by Posy Rorer on July 25, 2007 at 20:28:49
later apologized to Lemaitre, but I didn't post anything about Einstein first, Clark did. The fact that he used Einstein, who did have a mathematical model ( and I am not excluding any one else) means that there is a means for devising an experiment with predictable results. Even without the experimental proof, there was a means for creating an experimental basis testing the theory.
For many other events, I see no attempt at a numeration or a possible mathematical model. Not that one is absolutely necessary, mind you, but it would be nice to have in a description of effects. Nebulous statements and predictions, fill me with a certain, ah, apprehension, and not because of the uncertainty. I find that it sometimes (note: sometimes) indicates a certain lack of understanding of the full causality. A lack of complete understanding is also of no cause for alarm for me either. There's a lot of things I don't understand.
Stu
Follow Ups: