138.88.87.238
In Reply to: RE: "How, praytell, does one 'broadcast' via quantum mechanics?" LOL! posted by clarkjohnsen on June 29, 2007 at 07:32:44
my god clark-
none of that was aimed at you exclusively, and if you believed it was, then my apologies to you, sincerely! if there is any mocking to be aimed here, it is most certainly at the advertising copy afforded by this company.
now, the idea of science being 'finished' is an entirely different matter to a phone call 'fixing' a system. i haven't the slightest bias against science, nor do i think that i understand all of what is possible with quantum mechanics.
however.
a telephone call? honestly. perhaps a little more explanation of this magical technology is due, as a short web page with little or no explanation of how, as i stated previously, a limited bandwidth device such as a telephone, could do much of anything to another electronic device which is permanent, or even useful.
this is not the voice of a crazy flat earther here. i believe very much in the progress of science. quantum mechanics and string theory are fascinating. but that DOES NOT infer that i will believe that a telephone is somehow going to transmit quanta, nor that a stereo device will know what to do with them when and if sent. electrical impulses from 300-3khz. but not subatomic particles that will 'align' my audio system magically through the phone line.
i am quite capable of suspending my disbelief, and am not living life in some pre-galilean dreamstate-- but this one's got a LOT of fleshing out to do before i throw 3 twenties into the void for a 20 second phone call. if this is an unexpected response from the inventor, then perhaps his clientele has a great deal more money than sense, and i commend his knowledge of an incredibly gullilble market portion. i however don't pitch money down the sewer, nor even into 'proven' technologies that easily.
should this be some viable technology, i'd be very excited to read about it, and fully understand to the best of my ability. that's not what's been given- just testimonials on a screen, and no information. if you understand it, don't argue-- spill it. how's it work, and why? armed with this-- i'm all ears. GIVE over that supporting material so that a hypothesis is FORMABLE.
otherwise- 'til that is put forward, by you, or anyone-- it's still a steaming pile of con-artist scheme 'supported' by science very few of the general populus WILL understand.. a great seam to mine by the p.t. barnums of the audio world.
convince me, and i'll recant. til then, i apologize for you feeling personally attacked, but not for being skeptical.
d
Follow Ups: