In Reply to: RE: Horns and high efficiency . what effect ? posted by J. Phelan on April 3, 2017 at 09:17:01:
Of course on this forum there is polarised support for high efficiency speakers including horns and scepticism of other type of speaker - understandable as most of the posters here (including myself) own these things. Likewise if one goes to the Planar forum, people would generally praise ESLs and criticise horns - again understandably.
However most of what you say about ESLs is simply untrue, at least in relation to the latest Quads. I'm sure other ESLs are equally good or better than Quads.
Like you, I have always discounted Quads as being rather feeble and lacking in bass. However, as a result of a Quad 2905 owner replying to a posting of mine on a completely different subject, I visited his home. I was stunned at the quality of the sound, played at robust levels, in particular the imaging - better than my horns, though both systems need careful speaker placement.
That one audition prompted me into buying a pair. I now have both speakers in my room, each powered by appropriate amps. The horns have 845 monoblocks or Accuphase E-36 Class A and the Quad gollups up the 200 watts from the GamuT. Both are very good systems. Which do I prefer? It's very close - the Quads are undoubtedly better for some music, but the horns are just a tad more "exciting" to listen to on much other music. I'm going to keep the horns, but if I was a classical music fan, I'd keep the Quads.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Horns and high efficiency . what effect ? - cawson@onetel.com 09:43:02 04/03/17 (4)
- RE: Horns and high efficiency . what effect ? - J. Phelan 10:02:10 04/03/17 (3)
- RE: Horns and high efficiency . what effect ? - cawson@onetel.com 10:39:13 04/03/17 (2)
- Gamut/Sirius - jusbe 02:10:58 04/04/17 (0)
- RE: Horns and high efficiency . what effect ? - J. Phelan 11:49:33 04/03/17 (0)