Need speakers that can rock with just one watt? You found da place.
In Reply to: RE: WAF (nt) posted by RC Daniel on April 22, 2012 at 14:47:26:
Lucky fella!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full Thread Please enable JavaScript to allow Full Thread view. Topic - Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? - waj4all 13:02:21 04/21/12 (20) RE: Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? - Paul Joppa 15:24:35 04/22/12 (13) There is no substitute for cubic inches {Walter Chrysler} - Cleantimestream 19:04:52 04/23/12 (1) RE: There is no substitute for cubic inches {Walter Chrysler} - waj4all 20:00:29 04/23/12 (0) RE: Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? - waj4all 16:05:12 04/22/12 (10) RE: Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? - Paul Joppa 19:39:20 04/24/12 (5) RE: Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? - waj4all 22:39:50 04/24/12 (4) RE: Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? - Paul Joppa 14:40:56 04/25/12 (1) RE: Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? - Inmate51 20:41:26 04/25/12 (0) RE: Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? - cids 06:53:53 04/25/12 (1) RE: Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? - waj4all 09:01:53 04/25/12 (0) RE: Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? - weltersys 07:22:15 04/23/12 (3) RE: Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? - waj4all 10:51:08 04/23/12 (2) RE: Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? - weltersys 07:24:46 04/24/12 (1) RE: Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? - waj4all 10:27:27 04/24/12 (0) RE: Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? - Coner 21:57:54 04/21/12 (5) RE: Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? - waj4all 12:42:55 04/22/12 (4) WAF (nt) - djk 12:51:19 04/22/12 (3) RE: WAF (nt) - waj4all 13:02:44 04/22/12 (2) RE: WAF (nt) - RC Daniel 14:47:26 04/22/12 (1) RE: WAF (nt) - waj4all 15:27:28 04/22/12 (0) Follow Ups RE: WAF (nt) - waj4all 15:27:28 04/22/12 (0)