In Reply to: Re: Whomever designed Yorkville's C190... posted by Don M on January 17, 2007 at 18:36:29:
how far down do you think ENG can be safley taken with passive 3rd order? if happy @1K2 with cheap driver (210ti) then Id be happy :^)ENG - came in as screw-on - probably has HF limitations after point - that sets bolt-on back further and screw-on still has its "pipe" - at least construction is solid vs Dayton's cheaper WG - that one might work in pinch wiht 806 if could live with limatations.
if DDS or someone would offer either 15 WG or appropriate conical then things would be easier/better for the hobbyist -- must be demand for 15 vs 12.
I"m very sorry for Bill to have 501/HF horns tied up in Peru = bizzare goof on someone's part. AH's 300Hz petal horn looks good.
Best,
Freddy
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Whomever designed Yorkville's C190... - freddyi 21:45:45 01/17/07 (4)
- Re: Whomever designed Yorkville's C190... - Don M 12:48:33 01/18/07 (3)
- Re: Whomever designed Yorkville's C190...ENG sounds great - freddyi 14:10:19 01/18/07 (0)
- Re: Whomever designed Yorkville's C190... - freddyi 13:05:24 01/18/07 (1)
- Re: Whomever designed Yorkville's C190... - Don M 06:12:35 01/19/07 (0)