|
Hi-Rez Highway New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
|
|
|
Hi-Rez Highway New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
|
In Reply to: Re: SACD source, is old recording worth it ? posted by rick5 on August 1, 2002 at 10:31:53:
Tape hiss was an unavoidable side effect of the recording processes of the day. There is no way that watermarks are any sort of unavoidable side efffect of modern day recording practices. Watermarks represent a deliberately introduced distortion. This is very, very different. Can you not see that?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: SACD source, is old recording worth it ? - Mick Jones 12:52:00 08/01/02 (11)
- Re: SACD source, is old recording worth it ? - rick5 13:17:10 08/01/02 (10)
- Audible watermarking will only become 'normal' if consumers tolerate this practice. I personally... - Methos 14:02:56 08/01/02 (7)
- This IS disturbing. If y'all succeed in killing off SACD. - Oscar 19:30:33 08/01/02 (5)
- sorry I'm not torching my Warner DVD-As, they have great music and most sound better than even - Teresa 19:47:52 08/01/02 (4)
- Do the Warner's DVD-As have perfect sound? - tunenut 10:05:08 08/02/02 (2)
- I'll I saying is that this is the best the Warner Bros. recordings have ever sounded and yes they - Teresa 19:52:45 08/02/02 (1)
- certainly I am not saying you should deprive yourself - tunenut 21:46:43 08/02/02 (0)
- Alright, just forward your Grateful Dead stuff to me and I'll "disposition them properly" nt - Oscar 20:03:14 08/01/02 (0)
- Indeed [nt] - Ted Smith 14:07:49 08/01/02 (0)
- Re: SACD source, is old recording worth it ? - sxr71 13:26:29 08/01/02 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
