In Reply to: SACD equilivalent sampling rates posted by Tommart on January 19, 2001 at 20:15:46:
>> With redbook CDs we have 16 bits sampled at 44,100/second. Converted to single bits that is 44,100 times 16 = 705,600 bits/second. 96/24 would be 96,000 times 24 = 2,304,000--just short of SACD's 2.82 million rate. <<it's not that simple. You make the incorrect assumption that each bit in the 16-bit and 24-bit word-length is subject to the sampling rate. it is the word-length as a unit that is sampled. . .that's what PCM is all about. you can't just multiply the number of bits in each word-length by the sampling rate to get some sort of "absolute" rate. and anyway, as discussed at AES, DSD is said to have 4- or 8-bit properties, which make this all the more complex.
all that matters is how the formats sound. . .so there you go. i'll leave the engineering to the experts. it's beyond our control anyway.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- incorrect assumption - Jazz Inmate 20:30:46 01/19/01 (14)
- Re: incorrect assumption - Mars 01:13:58 01/20/01 (13)
- This is actually how the TacT Millennium does it's conversion... - Mikenificent1 04:51:43 01/23/01 (1)
- Re: This is actually how the TacT Millennium does it's conversion... - Mars 03:13:15 01/24/01 (0)
- Re: incorrect assumption - Tommart 04:39:18 01/20/01 (4)
- Re: incorrect assumption - Mars 22:51:42 01/20/01 (1)
- Re: incorrect assumption - Mars 11:41:33 01/20/01 (0)
- Re: incorrect assumption - Mars 10:28:22 01/20/01 (0)
- Re: incorrect assumption (correction) - Mars 01:36:03 01/20/01 (5)
- Re: incorrect assumption (correction) - SimonTJU 10:49:56 01/20/01 (4)
- Re: incorrect assumption (correction) - PaulH. 21:29:20 01/20/01 (1)
- Re: incorrect assumption (correction) - theob 07:26:13 01/21/01 (0)
- Re: incorrect assumption (correction) - Mars 11:51:17 01/20/01 (0)