In Reply to: "the quality of the original recording trumps everything else" posted by Chris from Lafayette on December 28, 2018 at 16:44:51:
" But that's not incompatible with preferring hi-rez, all other things being equal (which is what I think you were also saying)."
I was hoping to say a little more than that and apologise for my failure.
What I was trying to say is that in most cases (not all) the difference between a hi-res version and the redbook version of a well produced, well reproduced, recording will not be clearly discernable as part of a normal listening session i.e. not sitting there carrying out a/b comparisons to spot tiny differences. That is if you spent an evening here just playing albums, some hi-res some not, and I asked you to guess which were which I doubt that it would produce a statistically significant result.
However I will admit to normally choosing the hi-res version "just in case". So I do have a preference in that sense.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "the quality of the original recording trumps everything else" - PAR 00:29:39 12/29/18 (7)
- I'll bet my discernment between hi-rez and CD-rez would be very high. . . - Chris from Lafayette 08:35:33 12/29/18 (6)
- RE: I'll bet my discernment between hi-rez and CD-rez would be very high. . . - PAR 09:27:55 12/29/18 (5)
- just so! - Bruce from DC 11:44:33 12/29/18 (4)
- RE: just so! - PAR 16:10:37 12/29/18 (3)
- RE: just so! - Dave_K 06:23:26 12/30/18 (2)
- RE: just so! - Aaron 01 07:27:17 12/31/18 (1)
- RE: just so! - Bruce from DC 19:01:31 01/01/19 (0)