In Reply to: SACD allong with most hi rez is a fools errend posted by lokie on December 27, 2018 at 12:52:42:
When SACD and DVD-A came to market, high quality CD playback seemed expensive to chase. Playing some of the good SACDs and DVD-As through mid-priced hi-res players (around $1-2k roughly) gave me sound quality that was at least as good or better than what I was hearing from CDs on significantly more expensive players. That's how I got into hi-res in the first place. I attribute some of the difference to the new formats, and some of it to new masterings that were only available on hi-res.
I don't buy SACDs anymore, but I still buy hi-res downloads. Some are worth the extra cost over the CD, and some aren't. I try to scour the net for opinions before buying, and generally I think I've gotten my money's worth.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Opposite for me - Dave_K 14:27:17 12/27/18 (12)
- I'm pretty much with you - David S. 10:51:47 12/28/18 (0)
- +1 [nt] - Chris from Lafayette 00:05:05 12/28/18 (10)
- Hi-res? Sometimes. - PAR 14:51:55 12/28/18 (9)
- "the quality of the original recording trumps everything else" - Chris from Lafayette 16:44:51 12/28/18 (8)
- RE: "the quality of the original recording trumps everything else" - PAR 00:29:39 12/29/18 (7)
- I'll bet my discernment between hi-rez and CD-rez would be very high. . . - Chris from Lafayette 08:35:33 12/29/18 (6)
- RE: I'll bet my discernment between hi-rez and CD-rez would be very high. . . - PAR 09:27:55 12/29/18 (5)
- just so! - Bruce from DC 11:44:33 12/29/18 (4)
- RE: just so! - PAR 16:10:37 12/29/18 (3)
- RE: just so! - Dave_K 06:23:26 12/30/18 (2)
- RE: just so! - Aaron 01 07:27:17 12/31/18 (1)
- RE: just so! - Bruce from DC 19:01:31 01/01/19 (0)