In Reply to: RE: "Or, it could even be a 24/352.8 aiff file." posted by Ivan303 on July 11, 2017 at 16:02:59:
Do all these different formats really sound significantly different or are they small. For me it is still the original quality of the recording that matters. For example I really don't care for the sound of the Channel Classics recordings. The don't have the immediecy of for instance the old Decca, RCA and Mercury recordings. I think they are using to many mikes.Read a review of one of there recordings which said they used 17 mikes. Now it is really up to the mixer to create the sound they are looking for.
Alan
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "Or, it could even be a 24/352.8 aiff file." - ahendler 21:49:00 07/11/17 (6)
- Agreed! This should be said more often. nt - Mel 11:51:28 07/12/17 (0)
- Differences or small to non-existant... - Ivan303 07:15:01 07/12/17 (0)
- "Do all these different formats really sound significantly different or are they small?" - Chris from Lafayette 00:46:23 07/12/17 (3)
- RE: "Do all these different formats really sound significantly different or are they small?" - ahendler 11:29:06 07/12/17 (2)
- I don't understand your post - Chris from Lafayette 12:08:07 07/12/17 (1)
- RE: I don't understand your post - ahendler 15:24:02 07/12/17 (0)