In Reply to: Well, posted by jusbe on March 30, 2017 at 00:22:55:
it is a classic case of wealth generation using closed licensing systems.
I do acknowledge that Meridian has considerable expertise on the manipulation of red book files using a range of dither and dynamic range extension techniques. These work well with their earlier mastering processors which did not require extra outlay on the music. I suspect that some of what is now MQA incorporates what they learnt from earlier on. However, with cheap HDDs and 384k/DSD high sample rate systems, there is no reason for a closed system except for making more money for vendors of streaming services and perhaps in very small cheap portable systems. However, the savings by providers will result in more outlay for the consumer, both for software and for decoding hardware.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Well, - fmak 07:23:53 03/30/17 (17)
- RE: Well, - ahendler 07:37:40 03/30/17 (16)
- RE: Well, - Isaak J. Garvey 07:57:23 03/30/17 (15)
- RE: Well, I listened to - fmak 22:11:03 03/30/17 (0)
- RE: Well, - ahendler 12:06:47 03/30/17 (13)
- RE: Well, - jazz1 23:03:02 03/31/17 (0)
- RE: Well, - Isaak J. Garvey 12:45:08 03/30/17 (11)
- RE: Well, - ahendler 17:16:24 03/30/17 (10)
- MQA doesn't cost me anything - fmak 22:10:19 03/31/17 (9)
- RE: MQA doesn't cost me anything - zacster 05:51:16 04/01/17 (8)
- RE: MQA doesn't cost me anything - ahendler 08:52:01 04/01/17 (7)
- RE: MQA doesn't cost me anything - zacster 20:01:50 04/01/17 (6)
- RE: MQA doesn't cost me anything - AbeCollins 07:42:32 04/02/17 (1)
- RE: MQA doesn't cost me anything - zacster 10:06:20 04/02/17 (0)
- RE: MQA doesn't cost me anything - ahendler 20:11:06 04/01/17 (3)
- RE: MQA doesn't cost me anything - ahendler 13:05:16 04/02/17 (0)
- RE: MQA doesn't cost me anything - zacster 10:12:01 04/02/17 (1)
- RE: MQA doesn't cost me anything - Isaak J. Garvey 11:04:18 04/02/17 (0)