In Reply to: RE: Marantz 8802a vs.Emotiva XMC-1 5.1 analog (Kal Rubinson?)? posted by Ivan303 on December 18, 2016 at 12:00:53:
After six weeks of listening, JA said this in 2006:
"I haven't said anything about coloration. That's because, despite the variety of program material I auditioned on the Studio/100s, I was never made aware of any persistent problem in this area. This is one neutral speaker."
Read more at http://www.stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/105paradigm/index.html#Wove4q7DTvzZjrO9.99
9 years later KR let this slip about the Marantz AVM8802a:
"My only quibble was that the AV8802A delivered the same gracious, rounded sound as Marantz's esteemed Reference-series components—some may prefer a more prismatic clarity."
Read more at http://www.stereophile.com/content/music-round-75#h3KC0KCbdFwMTzws.99
So there you go - this f###in' pre-pro would sound as bad as the SA-14 did in my system, and it can't be Paradigm's fault!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- impossible... - Jim Pearce 12:28:19 12/18/16 (5)
- RE: impossible... - Ivan303 14:41:35 12/18/16 (0)
- Fault? - Kal Rubinson 13:36:04 12/18/16 (3)
- I was more or less joking with Ivan Kal... - Jim Pearce 13:56:29 12/18/16 (2)
- But wasn't he joking? - Kal Rubinson 14:09:46 12/18/16 (1)
- YES! - Ivan303 17:34:35 12/23/16 (0)