In Reply to: I'm with you... posted by John Elison on October 1, 2016 at 18:44:51:
In September 2007 the Audio Engineering Society published the results of a year-long trial, in which a range of subjects including professional recording engineers were asked to discern the difference between SACD and a compact disc audio (44.1 kHz/16 bit) conversion of the same source material under double blind test conditions. Out of 554 trials, there were 276 correct answers, a 49.8% success rate corresponding almost exactly to the 50% that would have been expected by chance guessing alone
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: I'm with you... - jaydacus 21:13:37 10/01/16 (19)
- RE: I'm with you... - Fitzcaraldo215 09:25:38 10/04/16 (0)
- Bwahahahah! - E-Stat 06:33:40 10/02/16 (12)
- RE: Bwahahahah! - erik_sq 14:35:21 10/04/16 (6)
- As Fitz pointed out - E-Stat 14:50:34 10/04/16 (5)
- RE: As Fitz pointed out - erik_sq 14:57:05 10/04/16 (4)
- Fletcher-Munson - E-Stat 08:27:53 10/05/16 (1)
- RE: Fletcher-Munson - erik_sq 09:50:29 10/05/16 (0)
- RE: As Fitz pointed out - Fitzcaraldo215 16:07:47 10/04/16 (1)
- RE: As Fitz pointed out - erik_sq 16:16:53 10/04/16 (0)
- RE: Bwahahahah! - jaydacus 07:38:25 10/02/16 (4)
- Disagree - E-Stat 08:06:48 10/02/16 (3)
- HRaudio.net lists over 11,000 SACDs. (Nt) - Jack G 08:38:57 10/02/16 (2)
- Some (many?) of those are out of print though - Chris from Lafayette 11:36:33 10/02/16 (0)
- Touche! - E-Stat 09:38:06 10/02/16 (0)
- RE: I'm with you... - pictureguy 00:12:10 10/02/16 (0)
- RE: I'm with you... - John Elison 21:31:10 10/01/16 (3)
- In addition, as some of the audio magazines have noted. . . - Chris from Lafayette 23:47:55 10/01/16 (2)
- RE: In addition, as some of the audio magazines have noted. . . - John Elison 08:00:34 10/02/16 (1)
- RE: In addition, as some of the audio magazines have noted. . . - erik_sq 09:52:57 10/05/16 (0)