In Reply to: Higher "Rez" Seems to Offer Lower Overall Quality posted by jaydacus on September 24, 2016 at 10:00:39:
Oh, this is so perfect.An anonymous internet blowhard with proclaims there is no benefit to 24/192 digital music. A blowhard who does not list his system, and admits to being a deadbeat who STEALS music instead of paying for it. I am sure you have a million justifications for it.
So now the case closed, 24/192 offers NO benefit over CDs because YOU say so. You, the unemployed deadbeat who steals hi rez files from torrents and "evaluates" them on your phantom system. Probably cheap plastic computer speakers.
Gotta love it.
Edits: 09/24/16
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Higher "Rez" Seems to Offer Lower Overall Quality - Isaak J. Garvey 20:07:56 09/24/16 (10)
- RE: Higher "Rez" Seems to Offer Lower Overall Quality - lokie 04:56:46 09/30/16 (0)
- RE: Higher "Rez" Seems to Offer Lower Overall Quality - jaydacus 08:59:36 09/25/16 (8)
- RE: Higher "Rez" Seems to Offer Lower Overall Quality - ahendler 11:49:43 09/26/16 (0)
- RE: Higher "Rez" Seems to Offer Lower Overall Quality - Isaak J. Garvey 10:19:18 09/25/16 (6)
- RE: Higher "Rez" Seems to Offer Lower Overall Quality - jaydacus 20:38:35 09/25/16 (5)
- Well, even conspiracy theories need their smoking gun. What's yours? - jdaniel@jps.net 18:16:29 09/26/16 (0)
- 24/192 tracks to their 16/44 counterparts - Roseval 04:19:20 09/26/16 (3)
- RE: 24/192 tracks to their 16/44 counterparts - ahendler 11:51:35 09/26/16 (2)
- RE: 24/192 tracks to their 16/44 counterparts - Tony Lauck 18:03:01 09/30/16 (1)
- RE: 24/192 tracks to their 16/44 counterparts - ahendler 21:34:54 09/30/16 (0)