In Reply to: Thank you!!! posted by Sordidman on February 26, 2016 at 11:06:53:
My pleasure.
Yes, to clarify, to BEST of my knowledge, NO SACDs exist with Wilson's remixes. They area all based on Ludwig's 24/96 remasters. See the link below. Perhaps I missed something.
Shameful really. To..upsample PCM and charge a fortune. What a crock.
Well to clarify mastering/remastering..(I coordinate reissue products for a living..)
REMASTERING..to me..is a new digital capture of analog master tape, and then tasteful polishing, repairing applied.
If it is a digital source, then one can take advantage of better converters and powerful DAWs to extract maximum fidelity..in almost all cases I am fan of staying in the box if the source is digital.
In the "old days", mastering is a bit of what you describe, it was more of a straight engineering job..but it changed and we started to see the rise of "celebrity" mastering engineers who maybe put more on of their stamp on a recording then was previously acceptable.
To me, the mastering stage should be where a good, experienced pair of ears makes sure everything is in order, with maximum fidelity. The final production master should not be totally a different product then was submitted. Just my take.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Thank you!!! - Isaak J. Garvey 11:25:52 02/26/16 (4)
- RE: Thank you!!! - fantja 07:30:26 02/27/16 (2)
- RE: Thank you!!! - Isaak J. Garvey 08:45:06 02/27/16 (1)
- RE: Thank you!!! - fantja 13:40:23 02/27/16 (0)
- Right, in the 80s, (with rock) labels started taking more - Sordidman 12:53:22 02/26/16 (0)