In Reply to: We need to bring people back to the Hi-Rez Highway at the Asylum posted by diw on December 5, 2015 at 05:49:12:
I suspect there are issues involved other than musical appreciation and criticism.
The new site is different, for sure, and perhaps you're simply averse to changes. I still see value in it. I do not miss the illiterate, inaccurate reviews posted voluntarily by users. Some of the reissued junk they reviewed was awful when it was initially released, and I can't imagine anyone whose opinion I value interested in purchasing it in hi-rez at double or triple the price and then being objective about its merits.
The new site still offers a yes/no opportunity to recommend specific offerings and comment on reviews, and I believe those are both useful options.
Some of the reviewers are more sophisticated than others, but at least one can establish a baseline with which to weed out the real dogs without spending $15 or more.
Peace,
Tom E
berate is 8 and benign is 9
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- You guys are being pretty harsh - madisonears 22:39:30 12/05/15 (4)
- RE: You guys are being pretty harsh - stvnharr 22:52:38 12/05/15 (3)
- RE: You guys are being pretty harsh - flyingdutchman 03:30:55 12/06/15 (2)
- Okay, then, that's not at all harsh - madisonears 21:09:48 12/06/15 (1)
- RE: Okay, then, that's not at all harsh - flyingdutchman 09:57:27 12/07/15 (0)