In Reply to: RE: I'll agree DSP room EQ is a much more practical approach for most people.... posted by Fitzcaraldo215 on February 19, 2012 at 07:41:22:
Carl,Why should I even bother with Audyssey EQ when the sound I am getting in my room is better than virtually any I have experienced at Hi-Fi Shows or Dealer Dem rooms with very over priced components. Visitors are always impressed with my sound,with closed eyes you can imagine the piano especially etc(Good recordings of course) are actually in the room.If I did not like the sound and remember I have vast experience in this field I would of course have to go to measurements & room EQ.
Edits: 02/19/12 02/19/12
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: I'll agree DSP room EQ is a much more practical approach for most people.... - Disbeliever 10:48:22 02/19/12 (29)
- RE: I'll agree DSP room EQ is a much more practical approach for most people.... - Fitzcaraldo215 13:45:58 02/20/12 (28)
- RE: I'll agree DSP room EQ is a much more practical approach for most people.... - Disbeliever 00:12:47 02/21/12 (21)
- RE: I'll agree DSP room EQ is a much more practical approach for most people.... - Fitzcaraldo215 11:03:07 02/22/12 (20)
- RE: I'll agree DSP room EQ is a much more practical approach for most people.... - Disbeliever 21:59:55 02/22/12 (19)
- RE: I'll agree DSP room EQ is a much more practical approach for most people.... - Disbeliever 00:50:27 02/23/12 (18)
- RE: I'll agree DSP room EQ is a much more practical approach for most people.... - Fitzcaraldo215 15:11:32 02/23/12 (0)
- Well........... - Kal Rubinson 05:59:59 02/23/12 (16)
- RE: Well........... - Disbeliever 06:59:25 02/23/12 (15)
- RE: Well........... - Fitzcaraldo215 12:30:41 02/23/12 (14)
- RE: Well........... - Disbeliever 23:12:14 02/23/12 (13)
- Well, there you have it. - Kal Rubinson 08:00:15 02/24/12 (11)
- RE: Well, there you have it. - Disbeliever 08:07:27 02/24/12 (10)
- RE: Well, there you have it. - Fitzcaraldo215 12:27:42 02/24/12 (9)
- RE: Well, there you have it. - Disbeliever 23:36:16 02/24/12 (8)
- RE: Well, there you have it. - Fitzcaraldo215 07:20:02 02/25/12 (7)
- RE: Well, there you have it. - Disbeliever 01:14:58 02/26/12 (6)
- Old and hoary story. - Kal Rubinson 08:27:59 02/26/12 (5)
- RE: Old and hoary story. - Disbeliever 23:00:02 02/26/12 (4)
- Tiresome...... - Kal Rubinson 05:53:53 02/27/12 (3)
- RE: Tiresome...... - Disbeliever 10:14:15 02/27/12 (1)
- Not relevant. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 11:46:12 02/27/12 (0)
- RE: Tiresome...... - Fitzcaraldo215 07:03:50 02/27/12 (0)
- RE: Well........... - Fitzcaraldo215 07:01:05 02/24/12 (0)
- RE: I'll agree DSP room EQ is a much more practical approach for most people.... - Disbeliever 00:06:16 02/21/12 (5)
- RE: I'll agree DSP room EQ is a much more practical approach for most people.... - stvnharr 12:19:03 02/21/12 (4)
- Disbeliever: Why are your fingers so sticky?? - Kal Rubinson 06:08:47 02/22/12 (1)
- RE: Disbeliever: Why are your fingers so sticky?? - Disbeliever 07:07:35 02/22/12 (0)
- RE: I'll agree DSP room EQ is a much more practical approach for most people.... - Disbeliever 00:28:49 02/22/12 (1)
- RE: I'll agree DSP room EQ is a much more practical approach for most people.... - stvnharr 13:50:23 02/23/12 (0)