RE: SACD format "dead and buried'?

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - SACD format "dead and buried'? - Avocat 14:39:52 03/19/10 (61)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - Sumflow 02:20:43 06/08/12 (5)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - Disbeliever 09:26:23 06/08/12 (4)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - Sumflow 12:18:00 06/08/12 (3)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - Disbeliever 16:38:14 06/08/12 (2)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - nairb 05:14:29 06/09/12 (1)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - Felixer 09:09:11 08/26/12 (0)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - Hi-Fidelity 07:09:49 03/27/10 (10)

"dead and buried'? - Sumflow 02:14:19 06/08/12 (0)

Good analogy toas further proof of "Dead and Buried"... - rich121 21:37:51 03/27/10 (8)

RE: Good analogy toas further proof of "Dead and Buried"... - Hi-Fidelity 12:19:32 03/29/10 (7)

RE: Good analogy toas further proof of "Dead and Buried"... - rich121 00:39:04 03/31/10 (6)

RE: Good analogy toas further proof of "Dead and Buried"... - Hi-Fidelity 06:56:00 03/31/10 (5)

RE: Good analogy toas further proof of "Dead and Buried"... - rich121 11:12:06 03/31/10 (4)

RE: Good analogy toas further proof of "Dead and Buried"... - Hi-Fidelity 13:59:27 04/01/10 (3)

SACD is dead. - growly 03:16:41 05/06/12 (2)

which Sony BluRay player doesn't support SACD??? - pbarach 09:42:34 05/06/12 (1)

RE: which Sony BluRay player doesn't support SACD??? - Disbeliever 00:14:24 05/07/12 (0)

Here's a clue... - DawgByte 17:01:14 03/24/10 (0)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - barondla 06:30:11 03/23/10 (2)

"See a pattern here?" - rich121 14:16:10 03/23/10 (1)

RE: "See a pattern here?" - avsBuddy 14:29:36 03/23/10 (0)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - Hiro 16:01:21 03/21/10 (14)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - regsrus2000 11:15:56 04/23/10 (0)

"doing well" - Sordidman 11:17:53 03/22/10 (2)

RE: "doing well" - Hiro 11:38:10 03/22/10 (1)

Any format that averages 3 or 4 titles a year.... - Sordidman 14:41:32 03/22/10 (0)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - rich121 10:37:36 03/22/10 (0)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - Farnsworth 19:16:02 03/21/10 (3)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - Hiro 10:55:26 03/22/10 (1)

Hopefully you actually like the music -t - Sordidman 11:16:40 03/22/10 (0)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - Disbeliever 04:30:01 03/22/10 (0)

Your link is to info dated Tuesday, December 29, 2009 - Metralla 17:44:29 03/21/10 (5)

RE: Your link is to info dated Tuesday, December 29, 2009 - Hiro 10:58:46 03/22/10 (4)

Are you being deliberately obscure? - Metralla 13:06:57 03/22/10 (3)

SACDs at the Grammys - Michael J Bishop 17:58:27 03/24/10 (2)

RE: SACDs at the Grammys - Disbeliever 09:08:02 03/25/10 (1)

Do a little work....look on the Grammy's site..(nt) - DTB300 07:45:17 03/31/10 (0)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - Dr.Phil 12:41:36 03/21/10 (3)

Can you provide a reference for................... - Kal Rubinson 12:54:34 03/21/10 (2)

RE: Can you provide a reference for................... - Dr.Phil 08:18:58 03/22/10 (1)

OK. - Kal Rubinson 09:02:16 03/22/10 (0)

Unless music downloads begin offering..... - lenw 10:08:59 03/21/10 (0)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - Ben Van Dyk 23:32:52 03/20/10 (0)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - Nieustevea@msn.com 15:07:40 03/20/10 (2)

Exactly! (nt) - Allen Wright 05:43:35 03/21/10 (0)

Hey - Watch what you say about cats - Chris from Lafayette 22:36:36 03/20/10 (0)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - tgd 11:11:04 03/20/10 (0)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - Ben Van Dyk 08:56:16 03/20/10 (0)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - fmak 22:11:53 03/19/10 (0)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - Dawnrazor 19:22:32 03/19/10 (1)

No, the SACD format is not dead and buried - audiozorro 00:09:59 03/20/10 (0)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - Real 19:21:40 03/19/10 (0)

I think you answered your own question. - Kal Rubinson 18:42:16 03/19/10 (6)

RE: I think you answered your own question. - JohanV 10:37:14 08/28/12 (3)

RE: I think you answered your own question. - paragons 11:22:43 08/28/12 (2)

RE: I think you answered your own question. - WOStantonCS100 21:15:18 09/05/12 (1)

RE: I think you answered your own question. - paragons 14:41:09 09/07/12 (0)

RE: I think you answered your own question. - Avocat 04:47:16 03/20/10 (1)

I am in complete agreement with you. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 07:28:13 03/20/10 (0)

A Jurno has to write shocking/attention getting headlines... - Allen Wright 15:55:25 03/19/10 (1)

to say SACD is dead - mbnx01 11:33:58 03/21/10 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - Hiro 16:01:21 03/21/10 (14)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - regsrus2000 11:15:56 04/23/10 (0)

"doing well" - Sordidman 11:17:53 03/22/10 (2)

RE: "doing well" - Hiro 11:38:10 03/22/10 (1)

Any format that averages 3 or 4 titles a year.... - Sordidman 14:41:32 03/22/10 (0)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - rich121 10:37:36 03/22/10 (0)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - Farnsworth 19:16:02 03/21/10 (3)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - Hiro 10:55:26 03/22/10 (1)

Hopefully you actually like the music -t - Sordidman 11:16:40 03/22/10 (0)

RE: SACD format "dead and buried'? - Disbeliever 04:30:01 03/22/10 (0)

Your link is to info dated Tuesday, December 29, 2009 - Metralla 17:44:29 03/21/10 (5)

RE: Your link is to info dated Tuesday, December 29, 2009 - Hiro 10:58:46 03/22/10 (4)

Are you being deliberately obscure? - Metralla 13:06:57 03/22/10 (3)

SACDs at the Grammys - Michael J Bishop 17:58:27 03/24/10 (2)

RE: SACDs at the Grammys - Disbeliever 09:08:02 03/25/10 (1)

Do a little work....look on the Grammy's site..(nt) - DTB300 07:45:17 03/31/10 (0)

Post a Message!