In Reply to: Now I have :) Thanks for the recommendation. posted by Ted Smith on April 3, 2007 at 19:21:48:
Likely if you bought it recently.The original pressing is significantly less dynamically compressed.
It won't recover details in the cymbals and it won't suddenly extend reverb tails below -96dB :-), but I find it's less congested/rigid.
May be hard to find except second hand. Let me know if you have no luck and are interested in hearing the original.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Are you listening to the remastered version? - Christine Tham 20:12:19 04/03/07 (4)
- Why would the newer version be more compressed? - Duilawyer 07:07:19 04/04/07 (1)
- It's the modern trend in mastering - Metralla 07:58:14 04/04/07 (0)
- Yep, two copyright dates: '84 and '97 - Ted Smith 20:18:46 04/03/07 (1)
- Re: Yep, two copyright dates: '84 and '97 - Fatbosco 20:04:39 04/05/07 (0)