In Reply to: Re: Yeah, but it still comes across as an overly expensive two-channel retro posted by Quint on March 8, 2007 at 08:38:49:
Thank you for your comprehensive and informative response to what I admit was a rather sharp critique on my end. (Although I am one not to be litigious) :)And yes, I did believe you were a professionally paid reviewer, to whom I do attach a certain status (yes I do) and responsibility and hold to a different standard. This no doubt was reflected in the tenor of my comments.
Robert C. Lang
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Thank you! - Robert C. Lang 09:21:57 03/08/07 (3)
- No harm, no foul - Quint 10:19:37 03/08/07 (2)
- Don't sell yourself short. - Jim Treanor 19:59:09 03/08/07 (1)
- Nice review... - McGruder 02:24:51 03/09/07 (0)