In Reply to: Re: Since you asked... posted by jfz on January 5, 2007 at 04:54:43:
****"Sometimes that "venue" is simply someone's living room. In the latter case, clearly the size is more similar to the space in which I listen to my stereo, i.e."****I do agree. I was in a "living room venue" with a live jazz band over the weekend (see comments below about the "New York Sessions" recordings) and I thought about then what you have shared here. The side/rear information is not *as* critical, but it is there nonetheless, especially in my venue the living room opened out to the entry hallway. Hopefully, any multi-channel recording of that type of venue would employ the subtlest of rear channel participation
****"Finally, just want to emphasis that this is my *perspective*. I'm not trying to say I'm right by listening to 2-channel, and that you are wrong for listening to multi".****
However, if a multi-channel listener has her/his system set up properly and if that same system is also used for two channel listening (by definition the two channel system would also be set up properly) then they are in a great position to compare the two layers and decide which one sounds the most like the real thing to them. A two-channel only listener does not have that choice.
Robert C. Lang
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Since you asked... - Robert C. Lang 15:30:14 01/05/07 (15)
- Re: Since you asked... - Ted Smith 21:56:23 01/05/07 (10)
- Re: Since you asked... - Robert C. Lang 22:24:37 01/05/07 (9)
- Re: Since you asked... - Ted Smith 22:57:10 01/05/07 (8)
- Re: Since you asked... - Phil W 10:22:23 01/06/07 (3)
- Sure :) But don't forget MikeL's system :) - Ted Smith 12:44:52 01/06/07 (2)
- Thanks. I'll show her both systems. BTW . . . - Phil W 14:59:05 01/06/07 (1)
- Re: Thanks. I'll show her both systems. BTW . . . - Ted Smith 16:08:40 01/06/07 (0)
- Impressive Indeed - Robert C. Lang 00:06:29 01/06/07 (1)
- Thanks - Ted Smith 00:16:46 01/06/07 (0)
- Re: Since you asked... - Robert C. Lang 23:55:42 01/05/07 (1)
- Cool - Ted Smith 00:32:52 01/06/07 (0)
- Re: Since you asked... - jfz 20:19:56 01/05/07 (3)
- "By definition" is not correct - Robert C. Lang 00:51:01 01/06/07 (1)
- Thanks Robert - jfz 16:06:07 01/06/07 (0)
- Re: Since you asked... - Robert C. Lang 21:45:23 01/05/07 (0)