|
Hi-Rez Highway New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
|
|
|
Hi-Rez Highway New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
|
In Reply to: Re: PCM & DSD posted by Joel_Waterman on November 26, 2006 at 13:15:58:
Everything else being equal I prefer DSD over PCM. But I, too, I have moved beyond that debate but for different reasons than many. So, to drop a fly in the ointment, while audiophiles can debate PCM & DSD even on whether they can hear a meaningful difference there is no doubt (no debate) that the multi-channel makes a far more compelling difference (like it or not), even when subtle and even though the listener may not even immediately detect that it is, in fact, multi-channel.It has been my experience that a correctly mastered multi-channel jazz recording (and I would bet that the Chesky recordings are) played on a good set up significantly enhances the quality of the production when compared to the real thing. This can be particularly true for jazz as per my comments a few threads below on Art Blakey and the Jazz Messengers. And if one does not like the mix listen in stereo.
Robert C. Lang
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: PCM & DSD - Robert C. Lang 16:26:38 11/26/06 (3)
- Other Concords To Try - Robertc88 05:00:16 12/02/06 (2)
- I'll compare - Robert C. Lang 19:32:00 12/02/06 (1)
- And Some Of The Telarcs - Robertc88 06:29:02 12/03/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
