DVDA sounds better and SACD..

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - DVD-A & SACD - weinstro 18:30:16 01/02/03 (62)

The War Is Hi-rez versus CD (nt) - Robertc88 16:32:46 01/03/03 (0)

SACD sounds better... - oscar 16:27:36 01/03/03 (0)

Re: DVD-A & SACD - rick5 08:19:37 01/03/03 (6)

Re: DVD-A & SACD - Rich 10:52:53 01/03/03 (0)

Horns Harsh and Strident? - ramossp 10:08:51 01/03/03 (4)

Re: Horns Harsh and Strident? - Jim Pearce 10:42:41 01/03/03 (3)

Examples - rick5 10:54:05 01/03/03 (2)

How do you know... - Rich 11:06:11 01/03/03 (1)

670/775 treble handling - Jim Pearce 11:40:01 01/03/03 (0)

DVDA sounds better and SACD.. - DVDman 00:20:00 01/03/03 (14)

So, DVDman, what do you think of those British Rolling Stone's remasters? - Audiophilander 06:46:26 01/03/03 (1)

Slight technicality errmm, but I've only seen the magazine advert so far! nt - DVDman 08:00:10 01/03/03 (0)

Re: DVDA sounds better and SACD.. - Johnno 02:40:17 01/03/03 (11)

No its not true for 5.1 - DVDman 04:18:54 01/03/03 (2)

Re: Not true. - John Kotches 05:45:20 01/03/03 (1)

Thanks John, I'll use that nt. - DVDman 06:11:49 01/03/03 (0)

Re: DVDA sounds better and SACD.. - Frank 04:04:42 01/03/03 (1)

Re: DVDA sounds better and SACD.. - Johnno 02:44:18 01/05/03 (0)

Re: DVDA sounds better and SACD.. - paulcordingley 02:57:47 01/03/03 (5)

Eh? - DVDman 04:20:54 01/03/03 (4)

Re: Score one for Paul! - John Kotches 05:43:34 01/03/03 (1)

I have 43 DVD-As, and don't need the TV...... - Jim Pearce 06:32:06 01/03/03 (0)

Re: Eh? - High-end Dreamer 05:42:55 01/03/03 (1)

Yes, but the guys are right; the player was first of all a DVDV for me! nt. - DVDman 08:59:46 01/03/03 (0)

This board is populated with people who have.... - Jim Pearce 21:35:27 01/02/03 (10)

Actually . . . - Martin says 01:46:47 01/03/03 (2)

Software - Jim Pearce 11:59:13 01/03/03 (0)

Perhaps, but it's us "old-fashioned people" that buy music rather than download lossy MP3 swipes! - Audiophilander 06:40:35 01/03/03 (0)

I think a $2,000.00 DVD-Audio player and a 5 month trial with 70 titles gives me a very good idea - Teresa 00:04:11 01/03/03 (5)

No. You paid only a few hundred bucks for that discontinued 1st generation player Teresa!! {n.t.} - Martin says 01:42:27 01/03/03 (4)

I would expect 1st generation DVD-A players to have fewer 'warts' - oscar 16:31:28 01/03/03 (3)

64fs DSD is an engineered flaw. A botched spec. I'm an engineer & musician. I won't touch it. {n.t.} - Martin says 06:02:56 01/04/03 (2)

Well, if we go buy specs, than CD remains "perfect sound forever"... - oscar 18:39:30 01/04/03 (0)

only because you prefer Specs over Music, if you loved music DSD is the only way to go, besides LIVE - Teresa 11:07:15 01/04/03 (0)

Re: This board is populated with people who have.... - Jazz Inmate 23:34:17 01/02/03 (0)

Another vote for SACD - Tommart 21:23:35 01/02/03 (1)

Agreed! nt - Edward 21:40:36 01/03/03 (0)

I HAD both, but . . . . - GHM 21:02:26 01/02/03 (9)

Thanks for the most constructive comment yet in the pseudo war between dvd-a and sacd nt - Norm 06:09:04 01/03/03 (0)

I also had both DVD-Audio and SACD, and basically agree but I found - Teresa 21:28:17 01/02/03 (7)

I still have both and basically agree. - Audiophilander 07:25:15 01/03/03 (5)

That's insane - chrischross 15:28:23 01/03/03 (4)

You do realize that I wasn't refering to MY collection in that last line? - Audiophilander 23:47:07 01/03/03 (0)

Used CDs - Quiet Please!! - Robertc88 16:31:28 01/03/03 (0)

drip...drip...drip...drip...drip...drip...drip...drip...drip...drip...drip...drip...drip...drip... - Methos 15:43:27 01/03/03 (1)

Heh, heh -- left my self open for that one! <nt> - chrischross 15:49:23 01/03/03 (0)

Teresa, you can kick the LSD habit. - Jim Pearce 21:39:17 01/02/03 (0)

You just had to start this up again. Look at archives. <nt> - bruce3825 20:25:33 01/02/03 (0)

I have both - 2x6spds 20:17:17 01/02/03 (0)

From someone who has both..... - Chris Garrett 19:04:19 01/02/03 (0)

On this site... - Rich 18:47:36 01/02/03 (8)

Re: On this site... - david hull 19:53:26 01/02/03 (7)

Re: On this site... - HighEndWire 20:58:17 01/02/03 (0)

Well...... - Chris Garrett 20:01:53 01/02/03 (5)

Can you make sure that you are listening to the MLP version... - sxr71 22:02:15 01/02/03 (2)

Yep..... - Chris Garrett 22:14:45 01/02/03 (1)

Re: Yep..... - sxr71 22:40:49 01/02/03 (0)

Re: Well...... - david hull 20:37:34 01/02/03 (1)

Like I said, there's the bonus crap to watch, but I don't really care....nt - Chris Garrett 21:37:04 01/02/03 (0)

'General consensus'? the generals on both sides are too busy fighting a war to answer damn fool... - Methos 18:40:46 01/02/03 (2)

Re: 'General consensus'? the generals on both sides are too busy fighting a war to answer damn fool. - mark111 07:44:41 01/03/03 (1)

I can only count those who actually post. : ) nt - Methos 13:59:28 01/03/03 (0)

Follow Ups

DVDA sounds better and SACD.. - DVDman 00:20:00 01/03/03 (14)

So, DVDman, what do you think of those British Rolling Stone's remasters? - Audiophilander 06:46:26 01/03/03 (1)

Slight technicality errmm, but I've only seen the magazine advert so far! nt - DVDman 08:00:10 01/03/03 (0)

Re: DVDA sounds better and SACD.. - Johnno 02:40:17 01/03/03 (11)

No its not true for 5.1 - DVDman 04:18:54 01/03/03 (2)

Re: Not true. - John Kotches 05:45:20 01/03/03 (1)

Thanks John, I'll use that nt. - DVDman 06:11:49 01/03/03 (0)

Re: DVDA sounds better and SACD.. - Frank 04:04:42 01/03/03 (1)

Re: DVDA sounds better and SACD.. - Johnno 02:44:18 01/05/03 (0)

Re: DVDA sounds better and SACD.. - paulcordingley 02:57:47 01/03/03 (5)

Eh? - DVDman 04:20:54 01/03/03 (4)

Re: Score one for Paul! - John Kotches 05:43:34 01/03/03 (1)

I have 43 DVD-As, and don't need the TV...... - Jim Pearce 06:32:06 01/03/03 (0)

Re: Eh? - High-end Dreamer 05:42:55 01/03/03 (1)

Yes, but the guys are right; the player was first of all a DVDV for me! nt. - DVDman 08:59:46 01/03/03 (0)

194.200.201.82