In Reply to: Sennheiser HD600 lovers sell me on them instead of NAD Viso HP50's posted by PhilJ on September 20, 2015 at 17:50:28:
Those are my two main pair of 'phones.
The Sennheisers are fussy to drive; I have finally settled on a Schiit Valhalla that I'm satisfied with, but I went through a lot of amps. OTL seems the way to go.
The NADs are so much less picky.
But for serious listening sessions, I go with the HD600s, while for daily listening I like the NADs, although they do look funny on the street.
And yes, the mids are great.
Jeff
"Decaf is for cowards."
Jack Kevorkian
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Oddly enough... - RJeff 18:22:04 09/20/15 (6)
- I am just using an Outlaw Audio integrated amp so maybe I should leave well enough alone - PhilJ 18:30:47 09/20/15 (5)
- True that - jedrider 20:13:01 09/20/15 (4)
- the open airy quality and extreme comfort the HD600's offer is attractive but if there is no synergy with - PhilJ 20:28:00 09/20/15 (3)
- "the HD600 sounds good with a mid price receiver" - pbarach 03:39:00 09/23/15 (2)
- RE: "the HD600 sounds good with a mid price receiver" - RJeff 14:58:17 09/24/15 (0)
- Thank you that is very helpful, I will try to find out more about the headphone section of my amp - PhilJ 13:45:24 09/23/15 (0)