In Reply to: Yeah, that extra 1.9 khz of HF response really... posted by Michi on March 13, 2005 at 23:27:13:
... with all that talk of your nipples hardening. :-)anyway, with regards to 48 vs 44.1 it depends on what sample rate the original master was at, and which one is closer to/integer multiple of either sample rate. (i regard sample rate conversion as inherently evil) :-)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Careful, Michi, you might be getting the "boys" on this forum all excited ... - Christine Tham 23:05:05 03/14/05 (2)
- I was afraid of that... - Michi 23:38:36 03/14/05 (1)
- Re: Sampling Rate madness. - John Kotches 05:33:10 03/15/05 (0)