In Reply to: DSP-based active speakers are different from conventional active speakers. posted by Kal Rubinson on March 19, 2020 at 05:33:35:
Kal, what are your thoughts on the differences between the digital processing and speaker design of the Kii Three and Image1? They both appear to make it relatively straightforward to correct for the acoustic anomalies of a typical listening space, but I don't fully understand the technical aspects of either speaker.
Tom
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: DSP-based active speakers are different from conventional active speakers. - tketcham 19:32:01 03/19/20 (6)
- RE: DSP-based active speakers are different from conventional active speakers. - Kal Rubinson 05:53:05 03/20/20 (5)
- RE: DSP-based active speakers are different from conventional active speakers. - tketcham 06:12:04 03/20/20 (4)
- RE: DSP-based active speakers are different from conventional active speakers. - Kal Rubinson 06:20:20 03/20/20 (3)
- RE: DSP-based active speakers are different from conventional active speakers. - tketcham 06:44:17 03/20/20 (2)
- RE: DSP-based active speakers are different from conventional active speakers. - Kal Rubinson 07:25:51 03/20/20 (1)
- RE: That wouldn't be so bad. /nm/ - tketcham 08:55:26 03/20/20 (0)