45.72.210.170
This Post Has Been Edited by the Author
In Reply to: RE: Pinging Isaac Garvey posted by John Atkinson on June 10, 2017 at 05:21:47
Isaac has made a fairly strong case that Stereophile is evangelizing and promoting MQA, by referring to the Stereophile articles themselves, and conveying his displeasure about that, with reasons.I could understand a little better if the Stereophile articles were opinion pieces, but they don't read like opinion pieces, opinion pieces don't normally read as gushy adulation, but rather as evidence based judgment. Well written opinion pieces generally present the different sides before expressing a conclusion.
So, I guess the question is: for what reason is Stereophile writing about MQA in a way that, to a fair reader, seems indistinguishable from an advertorial? Why is Stereophile allowing itself to become part of MQA marketing?
Edits: 06/12/17Follow Ups: