RE: Dear Jim Austin,

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Dear Jim Austin, - rt66indierock 16:37:25 11/14/17 (55)

It's a trap Jim.... - Ivan303 08:14:38 11/15/17 (0)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - 4everyoung 07:46:53 11/15/17 (39)

It's the text, stupid - DAP 21:43:00 11/15/17 (6)

RE: It's the text, stupid - stehno 11:51:40 11/20/17 (3)

Hear! Hear! RE: It's the text, stupid - Archimago 13:04:17 11/20/17 (2)

RE: Hear! Hear! RE: It's the text, stupid - stehno 18:37:10 11/20/17 (1)

RE: Hear! Hear! RE: It's the text, stupid - Archimago 23:40:38 11/20/17 (0)

Daniel - rt66indierock 09:52:19 11/18/17 (1)

RE: Daniel - regmac 07:40:41 11/21/17 (0)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - rt66indierock 12:03:27 11/15/17 (9)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - 4everyoung 07:26:19 11/17/17 (8)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - rt66indierock 09:25:58 11/18/17 (7)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - 4everyoung 12:24:19 11/18/17 (6)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - rt66indierock 10:07:23 11/19/17 (3)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - Charles Hansen 02:15:51 11/20/17 (1)

hear, hear, to CHansen - drmoran@aol.com 13:26:23 08/11/20 (0)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - 4everyoung 14:04:18 11/19/17 (0)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - regmac 08:35:24 11/19/17 (0)

RE: "I'd love to hear the story." - Krav Maga 13:17:53 11/18/17 (0)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - John Atkinson 08:25:48 11/15/17 (20)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - rt66indierock 11:48:03 11/15/17 (14)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - John Atkinson 05:07:07 11/16/17 (13)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - John Atkinson 16:49:28 11/20/17 (12)

Tell me about the crickets, John. I'm still awaiting your response 2 years later. - stehno 22:56:02 11/20/17 (2)

RE: Tell me about the crickets, John. I'm still awaiting your response 2 years later. - John Atkinson 11:57:25 11/21/17 (1)

Your endorsements seem more like those of an easily excitable kid in a candy store... - stehno 13:48:18 11/25/17 (0)

RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Krav Maga 17:49:47 11/20/17 (8)

RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - John Atkinson 04:15:45 11/21/17 (7)

RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Charles Hansen 10:47:24 11/21/17 (6)

RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - John Atkinson 14:08:51 11/21/17 (5)

RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Krav Maga 22:49:35 11/21/17 (3)

RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Charles Hansen 15:14:50 11/22/17 (2)

RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - stehno 00:07:23 11/26/17 (1)

RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - John Atkinson 08:28:18 11/26/17 (0)

RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Charles Hansen 19:00:37 11/21/17 (0)

De-legitimization efforts were well underway before this OP, helped greatly.... - Beef Guinness Cutie Pie 11:34:23 11/15/17 (2)

RE: De-legitimization efforts were well underway before this OP, helped greatly.... - John Atkinson 12:45:17 11/15/17 (1)

RE: De-legitimization efforts were well underway before this OP, helped greatly.... - faskenite 15:26:47 11/15/17 (0)

Did you send MQA the 6 raw (UNmixed/UNmastered) tracks from your own recording? nt - Rick W 08:54:09 11/15/17 (0)

So, your post might be reverse-delegitimizing? - Beetlemania 08:46:22 11/15/17 (0)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - regmac 08:10:22 11/15/17 (0)

I think it would be highly worthwhile . . . - Beetlemania 07:28:44 11/15/17 (0)

Any external pointer to the discussion at AES-NYC? TIA (nt) - Steve Cortez 23:13:59 11/14/17 (0)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - stehno 21:28:18 11/14/17 (1)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - The Bored 09:17:15 11/16/17 (0)

Does it really matter? - mkuller 21:18:56 11/14/17 (9)

RE: Does it really matter? - rt66indierock 12:15:14 11/15/17 (7)

It's not that hard to test - Dave_K 09:44:52 11/16/17 (4)

RE: It's not that hard to test - BubbaMike 12:03:58 11/16/17 (1)

RE: It's not that hard to test - Dave_K 05:32:39 11/17/17 (0)

RE: It's not that hard to test - rt66indierock 10:14:21 11/16/17 (1)

RE: It's not that hard to test - Dave_K 17:16:59 11/17/17 (0)

Do you have a dog in this fight? (nt) - mkuller 12:35:13 11/15/17 (1)

RE: Do you have a dog in this fight? (nt) - rt66indierock 12:44:39 11/15/17 (0)

Today ECM released their full catalog to streaming services, Tidal included. - bjh 21:36:18 11/14/17 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - 4everyoung 07:46:53 11/15/17 (39)

It's the text, stupid - DAP 21:43:00 11/15/17 (6)

RE: It's the text, stupid - stehno 11:51:40 11/20/17 (3)

Hear! Hear! RE: It's the text, stupid - Archimago 13:04:17 11/20/17 (2)

RE: Hear! Hear! RE: It's the text, stupid - stehno 18:37:10 11/20/17 (1)

RE: Hear! Hear! RE: It's the text, stupid - Archimago 23:40:38 11/20/17 (0)

Daniel - rt66indierock 09:52:19 11/18/17 (1)

RE: Daniel - regmac 07:40:41 11/21/17 (0)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - rt66indierock 12:03:27 11/15/17 (9)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - 4everyoung 07:26:19 11/17/17 (8)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - rt66indierock 09:25:58 11/18/17 (7)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - 4everyoung 12:24:19 11/18/17 (6)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - rt66indierock 10:07:23 11/19/17 (3)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - Charles Hansen 02:15:51 11/20/17 (1)

hear, hear, to CHansen - drmoran@aol.com 13:26:23 08/11/20 (0)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - 4everyoung 14:04:18 11/19/17 (0)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - regmac 08:35:24 11/19/17 (0)

RE: "I'd love to hear the story." - Krav Maga 13:17:53 11/18/17 (0)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - John Atkinson 08:25:48 11/15/17 (20)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - rt66indierock 11:48:03 11/15/17 (14)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - John Atkinson 05:07:07 11/16/17 (13)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - John Atkinson 16:49:28 11/20/17 (12)

Tell me about the crickets, John. I'm still awaiting your response 2 years later. - stehno 22:56:02 11/20/17 (2)

RE: Tell me about the crickets, John. I'm still awaiting your response 2 years later. - John Atkinson 11:57:25 11/21/17 (1)

Your endorsements seem more like those of an easily excitable kid in a candy store... - stehno 13:48:18 11/25/17 (0)

RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Krav Maga 17:49:47 11/20/17 (8)

RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - John Atkinson 04:15:45 11/21/17 (7)

RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Charles Hansen 10:47:24 11/21/17 (6)

RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - John Atkinson 14:08:51 11/21/17 (5)

RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Krav Maga 22:49:35 11/21/17 (3)

RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Charles Hansen 15:14:50 11/22/17 (2)

RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - stehno 00:07:23 11/26/17 (1)

RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - John Atkinson 08:28:18 11/26/17 (0)

RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Charles Hansen 19:00:37 11/21/17 (0)

De-legitimization efforts were well underway before this OP, helped greatly.... - Beef Guinness Cutie Pie 11:34:23 11/15/17 (2)

RE: De-legitimization efforts were well underway before this OP, helped greatly.... - John Atkinson 12:45:17 11/15/17 (1)

RE: De-legitimization efforts were well underway before this OP, helped greatly.... - faskenite 15:26:47 11/15/17 (0)

Did you send MQA the 6 raw (UNmixed/UNmastered) tracks from your own recording? nt - Rick W 08:54:09 11/15/17 (0)

So, your post might be reverse-delegitimizing? - Beetlemania 08:46:22 11/15/17 (0)

RE: Dear Jim Austin, - regmac 08:10:22 11/15/17 (0)

Post a Message!