In Reply to: RE: Arthur Salvatore posted by John Atkinson on September 17, 2017 at 14:29:27:
Since that observation came from editor of Stereophile, one would assume that publication finds my question humorous.
Frankly, my question was genuine.
If Stereophile has nothing to contribute, please don't contribute.
While I don't always agree with Arthur Salvatore's assessments of equipment, I have found much of his writing to be useful.
I wish I could say the same about Stereophile.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Arthur Salvatore - louie3 14:45:24 09/17/17 (10)
- RE: Arthur Salvatore - John Atkinson 04:21:35 09/18/17 (1)
- RE: Arthur Salvatore - louie3 08:44:06 09/18/17 (0)
- RE: Arthur Salvatore - morricab 02:08:38 09/18/17 (1)
- RE: Arthur Salvatore - Charles Hansen 09:08:44 09/18/17 (0)
- Is that a 3 after your name... - musetap 19:50:37 09/17/17 (1)
- RE: Is that a 3 after your name... - louie3 08:49:38 09/18/17 (0)
- RE: Arthur Salvatore - Jim Austin 17:24:10 09/17/17 (0)
- Have you emailed him? - hawkmoon 17:03:38 09/17/17 (2)
- RE: Have you emailed him? - defdum&blind 17:33:43 09/17/17 (1)
- Not so "Crazy Arthur" after all... - Ivan303 08:13:40 09/18/17 (0)