In Reply to: Stereophile and MQA... posted by mkuller on August 16, 2017 at 12:25:29:
One, if the editor and those individual writers were concerned about informing readers about MQA, shouldn't they include some of the points that Charles Hansen, Doug Schneider and others have been making in this forum in their coverage? And that the manufacturers Linn, Schitt and others have been making on their sites? Particularly about giving so much control over the entire recording industry to an external standards organization, MQA?Two, if the editor and those individual writers wanted to make an informed case for MQA, shouldn't they be clear on what is being compared to what? Can you tell, from the link mqas-sound-convinces-hardened-showgoers, what exactly is being compared to what? I initially thought they were comparing hi res PCM files to MQA, but then the comment "the CD of the recording ..."
Three, should the editor and those individual writers uncritically accept what they describe as the "jaw dropping" revelations at press events organized by MQA people? Where MQA people control the equipment, and hence the digital filters, through which they're listening to both the PCM and MQA files?
Four, when the editor and those individual writers write on this forum, they sound normal. But when they write articles about those MQA press events, they sound like they're writing promotional, marketing material. There's no evidence of a critical perspective. Why do they do that? Why can't they write normally?
As to a conspiracy, being co-opted into a marketing effort requires no conspiracy. In many ways it's the easiest route to take. Being conscientious and principled is harder.
Daniel
Edits: 08/16/17 08/16/17 08/17/17 08/17/17
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Just a couple of points - DAP 13:28:59 08/16/17 (10)
- Two Years... - Doug Schneider 07:56:08 08/17/17 (2)
- "many of the magazines we have today probably won't be here" - DAP 10:41:00 08/17/17 (1)
- RE: "many of the magazines we have today probably won't be here" - Doug Schneider 12:55:19 08/17/17 (0)
- Stereophile and MQA... - mkuller 13:50:23 08/16/17 (6)
- RE: Stereophile and MQA... - Jeffrey Lee 15:21:01 08/18/17 (1)
- RE: Stereophile and MQA... - fmak 09:17:17 08/24/17 (0)
- Art Dudley has a narrow range of interest - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 18:19:42 08/17/17 (0)
- You make strange statements :-) - DAP 22:09:14 08/16/17 (0)
- WTF does that have to do with what he said? - Rick W 14:13:34 08/16/17 (1)
- Everything...(nt) - mkuller 15:36:42 08/16/17 (0)