In Reply to: RE: Pinging Isaac Garvey posted by John Atkinson on June 10, 2017 at 05:21:47:
Isaac has made a fairly strong case that Stereophile is evangelizing and promoting MQA, by referring to the Stereophile articles themselves, and conveying his displeasure about that, with reasons.I could understand a little better if the Stereophile articles were opinion pieces, but they don't read like opinion pieces, opinion pieces don't normally read as gushy adulation, but rather as evidence based judgment. Well written opinion pieces generally present the different sides before expressing a conclusion.
So, I guess the question is: for what reason is Stereophile writing about MQA in a way that, to a fair reader, seems indistinguishable from an advertorial? Why is Stereophile allowing itself to be co-opted by MQA marketing?
Edits: 06/12/17 06/12/17 06/12/17
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I don't think Isaac is trolling - DAP 12:10:54 06/12/17 (11)
- RE: I don't think Isaac is trolling - John Atkinson 16:58:01 06/12/17 (10)
- RE: I don't think Isaac is trolling - DAP 00:03:39 06/13/17 (1)
- RE: I don't think Isaac is trolling - John Atkinson 14:34:11 06/13/17 (0)
- Many here know best how to - oldmkvi 20:13:36 06/12/17 (7)
- ... Publish a Magazine - DAP 07:38:12 06/13/17 (6)
- RE: ... Publish a Magazine - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 14:13:11 06/13/17 (5)
- RE: ... Publish a Magazine - Isaak J. Garvey 15:36:34 06/13/17 (0)
- If you wanna refute something Charles said nobody's stopping you. But..... - Rick W 15:08:59 06/13/17 (3)
- RE: If you wanna refute something Charles said nobody's stopping you. But..... - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 17:32:23 06/13/17 (2)
- RE: If you wanna refute something Charles said nobody's stopping you. But..... - Isaak J. Garvey 18:24:20 06/13/17 (0)
- Link to what you mentioned about misleading info? nt - Rick W 17:42:35 06/13/17 (0)