In Reply to: RE: But what about...? posted by Charles Hansen on May 23, 2017 at 14:36:56:
Hi,
I realized afterwards that you had posted something about this -- I was looking at the wrong part of the thread.
In any event, this so-called correction, *to me*, is the most intriguing part of MQA -- if, in fact, it can be done. (The compression gets more irrelevant with the passing of each day.)
Regarding this correction, I'd think it would be VERY easy for the MQA folks to demonstrate by yanking out an A/D that "smears" what they correct and record their own demo tracks to show it in action. But the lack of comparison material is the most troubling aspect of this technology -- there's very little. That, to me, makes the whole thing suspicious.
Doug Schneider
SoundStage!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: But what about...? - Doug Schneider 15:49:03 05/23/17 (11)
- RE: But what about...? - Charles Hansen 16:46:36 05/23/17 (10)
- RE: But what about...? - Doug Schneider 04:02:48 05/24/17 (9)
- RE: But what about...? - Charles Hansen 10:44:02 05/24/17 (8)
- RE: But what about...? - Doug Schneider 18:17:15 05/24/17 (7)
- RE: But what about...? - Charles Hansen 04:43:53 05/25/17 (3)
- RE: But what about...? - Doug Schneider 05:14:56 05/25/17 (2)
- RE: But what about...? - Charles Hansen 09:56:48 05/25/17 (0)
- RE: But what about...? - Charles Hansen 09:22:10 05/25/17 (0)
- RE: But what about...? - Isaak J. Garvey 19:09:25 05/24/17 (1)
- RE: But what about...? - John Atkinson 04:24:34 05/25/17 (0)
- RE: But what about...? - Isaak J. Garvey 19:05:22 05/24/17 (0)