In Reply to: RE: MQA ... why bother? ... why not just use least significant bits truncation? posted by ahendler on May 22, 2017 at 13:25:58:
It seems you are asserting the low order bits *are not* replaced as Charles Hansen says.
If that *is* the case could you please share what you know on the topic ... which would presumably be that origami folding (encoding) of 2FS and 4FS audio info into the low order bits is done in a manner that allows (on decoding) recovery of LSB bits to original values (in addition to the 2FS and 4FS info)
If that *is not* the case then please re-read my post and the Hansen posts referenced within.
TIA
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: MQA ... why bother? ... why not just use least significant bits truncation? - bjh 13:38:55 05/22/17 (3)
- RE: MQA ... why bother? ... why not just use least significant bits truncation? - ahendler 15:07:56 05/22/17 (2)
- RE: MQA ... why bother? ... why not just use least significant bits truncation? - bjh 15:13:43 05/22/17 (1)
- RE: MQA ... why bother? ... why not just use least significant bits truncation? - ahendler 17:17:51 05/22/17 (0)