In Reply to: Although the article itself contains at least one patently absurd statement ... posted by DAP on April 3, 2017 at 14:03:29:
>> Hmmm ... I think Doug should either do that test or omit that sentence :-)
Apparently you missed the part where John Atkinson is the only outside person who has been supplied MQA versions of reference material submitted with good provenance. Doug's request to have them do this for him was ignored by MQA as were similar requests by others.
That's a very necessary step -- one needs to know that the MQA version came from the same source as non-MQA files. Any comparison is meaningless without this step so what you ask of Doug is currently impossible.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Although the article itself contains at least one patently absurd statement ... - mlsstl 19:09:03 04/05/17 (37)
- RE: Although the article itself contains at least one patently absurd statement ... - John Atkinson 04:22:26 04/06/17 (36)
- What's most striking to me ... - Jim Austin 05:33:34 04/09/17 (5)
- RE: What's most striking to me ... - Isaak J. Garvey 07:50:03 04/09/17 (4)
- RE: What's most striking to me ... - Jim Austin 08:07:36 04/09/17 (3)
- PS. - Jim Austin 08:29:04 04/09/17 (0)
- RE: What's most striking to me ... - Isaak J. Garvey 08:28:53 04/09/17 (0)
- To clarify - Jim Austin 08:25:26 04/09/17 (0)
- Thanks for the info... - mlsstl 14:46:01 04/06/17 (0)
- Too many assumptions... - Doug Schneider 08:33:09 04/06/17 (17)
- RE: Too many assumptions... - ahendler 14:14:39 04/06/17 (13)
- RE: Too many assumptions... - Doug Schneider 19:46:32 04/06/17 (0)
- RE: Too many assumptions... - Isaak J. Garvey 14:32:43 04/06/17 (11)
- RE: Too many assumptions... - ahendler 19:07:54 04/06/17 (10)
- RE: Too many assumptions... - Isaak J. Garvey 19:22:32 04/06/17 (9)
- RE: Too many assumptions... - ahendler 19:59:22 04/06/17 (8)
- RE: Too many assumptions... - ahendler 20:05:38 04/06/17 (7)
- RE: Too many assumptions... - Isaak J. Garvey 20:25:23 04/06/17 (6)
- RE: Too many assumptions... - 4everyoung 06:03:37 04/07/17 (5)
- RE: Too many assumptions... - Isaak J. Garvey 07:21:16 04/07/17 (4)
- RE: Too many assumptions... - 4everyoung 10:44:44 04/09/17 (3)
- RE: Too many assumptions... - Isaak J. Garvey 15:52:28 04/09/17 (0)
- but give him credit for being honest ... - DAP 11:32:59 04/09/17 (1)
- I was trying to be nice:-) - 4everyoung 16:26:50 04/09/17 (0)
- RE: Too many assumptions... - John Atkinson 08:44:29 04/06/17 (2)
- RE: Too many assumptions... - Jim Austin 05:10:36 04/09/17 (0)
- RE: Too many assumptions... - Doug Schneider 10:59:39 04/06/17 (0)
- RE: Although the article itself contains at least one patently absurd statement ... - Isaak J. Garvey 07:56:49 04/06/17 (10)
- RE: Although the article itself contains at least one patently absurd statement ... - John Atkinson 08:39:38 04/06/17 (9)
- RE: Although the article itself contains at least one patently absurd statement ... - Isaak J. Garvey 08:45:24 04/06/17 (8)
- RE: Although the article itself contains at least one patently absurd statement ... - John Atkinson 08:59:02 04/06/17 (7)
- RE: Although the article itself contains at least one patently absurd statement ... - Isaak J. Garvey 09:05:20 04/06/17 (6)
- "You have not published one single critical report of MQA." - DAP 09:45:13 04/06/17 (5)
- RE: "You have not published one single critical report of MQA." - Isaak J. Garvey 09:55:04 04/06/17 (4)
- RE: "You have not published one single critical report of MQA." - J. Phelan 06:30:48 04/07/17 (1)
- RE: "You have not published one single critical report of MQA." - Isaak J. Garvey 07:22:08 04/07/17 (0)
- Consequences? - DAP 10:21:36 04/06/17 (1)
- RE: Consequences? - Isaak J. Garvey 11:05:02 04/06/17 (0)