In Reply to: Audio critics should publish their hearing tests posted by triamp on March 21, 2017 at 16:39:14:
>I sent the folowing to the editors of STEREOPHILE- and received no reply.The STletters address is an alias for a folder in my inbox.
>Via Email: STletters@entusiastnetwork.com
I didn't receive your email because there is a typo in the address you
used (above).>For the sake of honesty, transparency and credibility, I propose that your
>reviewers post results of their hearing tests- standard as well as extended
>high-frequency audiometry.This issue has been raised before. Both Kal Rubinson and I have published
our hearing ability - see, for example, fig.5 at the link below - but to
the best of my knowledge, no other reviewers for any other magazines have
done so.
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
Edits: 03/22/17
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Audio critics should publish their hearing tests - John Atkinson 04:17:51 03/22/17 (5)
- RE: Audio critics should publish their hearing tests - John Atkinson 11:22:05 03/23/17 (4)
- RE: Audio critics should publish their hearing tests - Pjay 10:17:17 03/30/17 (1)
- RE: Responding - John Atkinson 10:42:12 03/31/17 (0)
- Response - Inmate51 14:19:44 03/23/17 (1)
- On the other hand, he might actually be a - DAP 11:18:26 03/27/17 (0)