Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Corrections posted by J. Phelan on March 17, 2017 at 10:59:39:
No DAC- no conversion. Therefore does not drive speakers either.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Reviewers with LP (or digital) -final - J. Phelan 04:44:06 03/16/17 (57)
- RE: Reviewers with LP (or digital) -final - morricab 15:37:13 03/18/17 (1)
- RE: Reviewers with LP (or digital) -final - J. Phelan 16:24:04 03/18/17 (0)
- Corrections - Ralph 09:05:20 03/16/17 (54)
- RE: Corrections - J. Phelan 09:42:48 03/16/17 (53)
- RE: Corrections - RGA 17:52:45 03/16/17 (0)
- RE: Corrections - Ralph 10:03:58 03/16/17 (51)
- RE: Corrections - J. Phelan 10:31:22 03/16/17 (50)
- RE: Corrections - Ralph 13:52:04 03/16/17 (49)
- RE: Corrections - J. Phelan 14:25:41 03/16/17 (48)
- Please. - Kal Rubinson 15:54:09 03/16/17 (0)
- RE: Corrections - Ralph 15:37:51 03/16/17 (46)
- RE: Corrections - J. Phelan 15:55:11 03/16/17 (45)
- A pretty good description of class D and why its not actually digital. - Ralph 10:56:17 03/22/17 (10)
- RE: A pretty good description of class D and why its not actually digital. - J. Phelan 14:29:38 03/22/17 (9)
- Ah. So we're in agreement here. - Ralph 15:15:40 03/22/17 (8)
- RE: Ah. So we're in agreement here. - J. Phelan 15:29:42 03/22/17 (7)
- That's right! - Ralph 09:32:39 03/23/17 (6)
- RE: That's right! - J. Phelan 14:26:06 03/23/17 (5)
- You don't know what 'analog' means, apparently - Ralph 09:24:57 03/24/17 (4)
- RE: You don't know what 'analog' means, apparently - J. Phelan 13:31:56 03/24/17 (3)
- That's pretty funny. - Ralph 14:04:53 03/24/17 (2)
- RE: That's pretty funny. - J. Phelan 15:20:30 03/24/17 (1)
- RE: That's pretty funny. - Ralph 09:40:22 03/27/17 (0)
- RE: Corrections - Ralph 08:53:21 03/17/17 (2)
- RE: Corrections - J. Phelan 10:59:39 03/17/17 (1)
- That's really funny - Ralph 11:28:42 03/17/17 (0)
- Link? (nt) - mkuller 21:39:37 03/16/17 (30)
- RE: Link? (nt) - J. Phelan 06:29:15 03/17/17 (29)
- Most likely you still won't get it, but... - E-Stat 06:53:31 03/17/17 (28)
- RE: Most likely you still won't get it, but... - J. Phelan 07:17:49 03/17/17 (27)
- RE: you still won't get it... - Ralph 08:41:07 03/17/17 (25)
- RE: you still won't get it... - J. Phelan 10:57:40 03/17/17 (24)
- RE: you still won't get it... - Ralph 11:27:44 03/17/17 (23)
- RE: you still won't get it... - J. Phelan 11:34:25 03/17/17 (22)
- Which means: - Ralph 11:48:52 03/17/17 (21)
- Start with the dictionary definition of "digital" - Dave_K 09:59:54 03/18/17 (15)
- RE: Start with the dictionary definition of "digital" - Ralph 09:49:51 03/20/17 (12)
- RE: Start with the dictionary definition of "digital" - J. Phelan 10:01:15 03/20/17 (11)
- you would be incorrect about that - Ralph 10:47:25 03/20/17 (10)
- RE: you would be incorrect about that - J. Phelan 11:38:52 03/20/17 (9)
- Wow. Just wow. - Ralph 12:46:29 03/20/17 (8)
- RE: Wow. Just wow. - J. Phelan 14:23:18 03/20/17 (7)
- RE: Wow. Just wow. - Ralph 14:56:16 03/20/17 (6)
- RE: Wow. Just wow. - J. Phelan 17:24:37 03/20/17 (5)
- That's a good link - Ralph 08:38:29 03/21/17 (4)
- RE: That's a good link - J. Phelan 15:58:53 03/21/17 (3)
- RE: That's a good link - Ralph 10:06:59 03/22/17 (2)
- RE: That's a good link - J. Phelan 14:31:34 03/22/17 (1)
- RE: That's a good link - Ralph 15:16:38 03/22/17 (0)
- RE: Start with the dictionary definition of "digital" - J. Phelan 12:58:04 03/18/17 (1)
- RE: Start with the dictionary definition of "digital" - Ralph 09:37:31 03/20/17 (0)
- RE: Which means: - J. Phelan 13:54:00 03/17/17 (4)
- I was correct - E-Stat 07:22:06 03/17/17 (0)
Follow Ups
- That's really funny - Ralph 11:28:42 03/17/17 (0)