In Reply to: Three dimensional space posted by Analog Scott on November 28, 2016 at 17:30:20:
And visual cues give us far more accurate information on where things are and how far away they are than auditory cues.
Except of course when you're sitting in the orchestra and can't see many performers past the first violins, cellos and bass. All the woodwinds and various brass are back there somewhere.
Imaging in audio is far more precise, far more defined and far more palpable in high end audio than in real life.
Not always, but I agree with the sentiment. You'll note I said nothing at all about "precise imaging". Just observed the ability to render all the instruments clearly in a larger apparent space.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Three dimensional space - E-Stat 19:01:09 11/28/16 (13)
- RE: Three dimensional space - Analog Scott 19:20:59 11/28/16 (12)
- RE: Three dimensional space - morricab 07:29:51 12/01/16 (6)
- RE: Three dimensional space - A.Wayne 10:02:22 12/06/16 (2)
- EQing? - Analog Scott 13:40:23 12/06/16 (1)
- RE: EQing? - Inmate51 21:32:21 12/31/16 (0)
- RE: Three dimensional space - Analog Scott 08:00:28 12/01/16 (2)
- RE: Three dimensional space - morricab 12:47:29 12/01/16 (1)
- RE: Three dimensional space - Analog Scott 14:35:18 12/01/16 (0)
- RE: Three dimensional space - E-Stat 05:47:33 11/29/16 (4)
- I have quite a few recordings that work to the contrary. - Analog Scott 08:10:42 11/29/16 (3)
- RE: I have quite a few recordings that work to the contrary. - E-Stat 08:24:54 11/29/16 (2)
- RE: I have quite a few recordings that work to the contrary. - Analog Scott 14:34:20 11/29/16 (1)
- "I prefer less realistic more palpable imaging" - E-Stat 15:00:28 11/29/16 (0)